Cosigned. Go to a forum for women's menstrual issues if you feel that bad. They might have something to help you. We certainly don't.
Spurs can beat the Thunder, it's the Heat that are still the toughest road to go through.
Thank you so much for posting this original topic. Will recommend to my friends and family.
Maybe, maybe not. But this team defenitely lucked out with the way the Western conference POs played out and we're not getting a better scenario next year...
The Spurs have always been a successful team. As a franchise, we have never missed the playoffs in two straight years, and we only missed the playoffs three times in our first 15 years in the league. We have always had a winning culture in San Antonio. I just can't see that going away even after Tim and Pop leave. It would take a dramatic FO overhaul for the worse to make the Spurs a perennial lottery team.
And even if they somehow become a perennial lottery team, I will still love the Spurs. That is what a true fan does. God I swear some of y'all are so spoiled it's sickening.
What a crock of . The Spurs are a much better team than OKC without Harden and with an improved Danny Green and Kawhi Leonard we probably would have still beat them if they had Harden.
OKC traded the wrong guard.
What position did you play this season, OP?
Back-up Punter...
So are you gonna change your name from Spursfan4-life to Spursfantill-duncanretires?
Even if Westbrook had been healthy the spurs would have taken the thunder in 6 games. Trading Harden dropped them below the spurs.
Or Right Guard - Left Tackle - guard the right side of the bench and tackle anyone who tries to drink from the water cooler.
So there is light at the end of the long, dark tunnel.
It's hard to say imho. OKC would've been much tougher to beat with Westchuck healthy and his heart in the ribcage, but the spurs would've still ended up winning it. they were weakened by the Harden deal while the spurs had improved from the prior season with the young talents growing into consistent rotational players. If they hadn't traded harden and had a healthy Westchuck against the spurs then the series would've been a toss-up maybe.
Your time on this board should be over.
obvious troll account is obvious. we were better than last year, and OKC was worse than last year.
If they still had Harden, the scales tip in their favor. Without him, no way we lose to them last year, if everyone is healthy.
I've said that since day one. If they trade Westbrick, they can then give the five year extension to the better guard: Harden.
Depends. If they get the same refs as the year before than yes. They called everything against us in the 4thQ of those games against the Thunder in the WCF's.
Without Harden, the thunder are a solid playoff team but are no longer a threat to get back to the finals.
How can you say that? They won 60+ games last year and were the #1 seed in the West...all without Harden. Only reason they didnt go as far as they were expected was because losing one of their big 2. Who can lose one of their top 2 players and still win? Imagine if we lost Parker or Duncan...we definately wouldnt have reached the Finals.
I think that the thunder will be solid next year and they may still win 60 games but I think that Harden was the difference maker as far as getting that team to the finals. I could be wrong though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)