nice shot tbh...brown bag but still a nice photo
lol im sure they'd find a way to illegally get a gun if their motive is clear. there's nothing wrong with restoring cons utional rights once you serve out your debt to society.
nice shot tbh...brown bag but still a nice photo
There is if said convicted felon is proven violent. It would be moronic to allow violent offenders to legally obtain weapons. You think that will make gun violence stats drop? Or do you just not care? Sure they can do it ILLEGALLY, but if caught armed they go right back where they belong without needing to commit a different crime and possibly hurt another victim. Its called gun RIGHTS for a reason. Some shouldnt have that right
maybe if our justice system focused more on rehabilitation than locking people up that wouldn't be an issue.
banning someone from society isn't going to repair anything.
Randian Paul is simply shilling for the gun manufacturers and their profits, which come back to him as campaign donations.
He, the NRA, gun mfrs don't give a flying about 2nd Amendment. 2nd Amendment "belief" is for suckers, dupes, gun fellators, bubbas, rednecks who think the few contentious words of the 2nd Amendment, the most importatant Amendment in their benighted world, is all they need to know.
Guns are all about $$$ and the power to use those $$$ to ac ulate power to ac ulate more $$$ to keep duping the gun fellators and 2nd Amendment believers.
No, this is just a basic libertarian position on the issues. You are a troll.
so-called libertarianism, esp the "hate govt/no regulations" aspects are shilling positions for the 1%, the mega-corps.
Rand Paul, libertarian fraud, is as much a quid-pro-quo corrupt politician as any of them.
Violent criminals deserve prison. How much of a bleeding heart are you? Just answer this. Do you believe that legal guns for violent ex cons would NOT lead to more crime?
we can't sustain the prison system as it is. rehabilitation would drastically decrease the upkeep of the system, and legalization of certain substances that imprison people would cut much of the population.
you're moving goalposts by citing violent crime. clearly the argument is paving forward options for non-violent convicted felons.
I'm not moving anything, I made my point and stuck to it. What I didn't do was argue against rehab for non violent, nor did I claim I was pro-drug war anti legalization etc..because I'm not. My point was simply that violent offenders should never be allowed to lawfully carry. Some consequences are necessary. And you didnt answer the question either, just deflecting as expected.
You are a weirdo.
You do realize the mega-corps are the government don't you?
keep backpedaling, you're doing a great job.
Not backpedaling at ALL. You are by avoiding my questions then employing the weak-ass tactic of deflection
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)