This is ridiculous

[SpursWoman]

That's horrible... but

I believe that was GTA3, I had never heard of it before and had no idea that the game was that bad and wasn't paying that much attention (obviously), aside from the fact that I really like the soundtrack (which up until then was all I heard). I figured the stealing cars part, but not all of that other stuff. But that really threw me for a loop.

It was one of those moments where you know you have to do the "right thing" and lay the hammer down, but you're desperately fighting laughing your ass off.

Maybe that makes me a candidate for Bad Mother O'The Year, but that was pretty damn funny. My only relief was that when I asked, neither one of them knew what a hooker was...just that that's what she was.

[Ginofan]

Australia Outlaws 'Grand Theft Auto'

Fri Jul 29, 6:59 AM ET

SYDNEY, Australia - Australian officials effectively banned the computer game "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" and ordered it removed from stores Friday because it contains hidden sex scenes that can be viewed with a special Internet download.

The Office of Film and Literature Classification said in a statement it had outlawed sales of the game by stripping it of its official classification after learning of the explicit content.

"Revocation of a classification means the computer game cannot be legally sold, hired, advertised or exhibited in Australia from the date the decision is made," the statement said.

"Businesses that sell or hire computer games should remove existing stocks of this game from their shelves immediately," said Des Clark, director of the government-funded classification board.

The game involves a main character seeking bloody vengeance on gang-filled streets, firing automatic weapons and picking up women along the way.

After downloading and installing a modification to the game — one of many "mods" available on Web sites maintained by video game enthusiasts — a new world opens up in which the girlfriends appear nude and engage in explicit sex acts, according to the modification's author.

The classification board in October 2004 gave the game a MA15+ rating, meaning it could be sold only to people aged over age 15, and warned that it contained "medium level animated violence, medium level coarse language."

On Friday, Clark advised parents to be on the alert for their children accessing the explicit scenes.

"Parents are strongly advised to exercise caution in allowing children continued access to the game," he said — particularly if they have access to the Internet modification.

Damn, is it really THAT bad?!

[SpursWoman]

Damn, is it really THAT bad?!

We have it, and yes....it is that bad.

[bigzak25]

graphic violence okay.

pixel animated recreated sex. outrage.

sad.

it's just like the soutpark where the kids were playing with weapons but the parents got pissed cuz cartman walked the stage naked...

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

graphic violence okay.

pixel animated recreated sex. outrage.

sad.

it's just like the soutpark where the kids were playing with weapons but the parents got pissed cuz cartman walked the stage naked...

Preachin' to the choir, man!

Killing hookers isn’t that bad.

Neither is stealing a cop car, performing drive-bys on rival gang members or making multimillion-dollar drug deals.

In the world of Grand Theft Auto, all these actions “may be suitable for persons age 17 and older,” but introduce digitized, pixilated and badly acted hardcore sex acts and everybody has a fit.

In the pursuit of both journalistic ethics and the chance to find something to laugh at, members of The University Star staff and editorial board observed a 1 1/2-minute video clip of the so-called “Hot Coffee” mini-game in which GTA: San Andreas’ main character C.J. and his girlfriend engage in oral sex and multiple positions of intercourse.

While we believe the Entertainment Software Ratings Board’s change in rating from “Mature” to “Adults Only” is warranted based on the descriptors of rating content, we also believe that this incident is once again a loud call to the parents of video-game players to finally take personal responsibility in what they purchase instead of relying on and asking the government, video-game publishers and retailers to perform the duties of content police.

It is noteworthy that the legal age of consent to actually perform the acts portrayed in the game is in most states younger than what people are arguing should be the legal age to purchase the game.

Now, as with every hot-button issue that gets voters crazy, Congress is stepping to the plate to defend those people who absolutely need the government to tell them what to play and read.

On Monday, the House of Representatives voted 355-21 for HR 376 to investigate whether or not the publishers of the game intentionally hid the content from the ESRB. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-New York, is also threatening to ask for a Senate investigation. At this point, politicians are simply grandstanding, and it should be noted that Clinton is a possible presidential candidate in 2008.

We don’t deny that Rockstar and Take Two Interactive are the authors of the offending code, and they have admitted as much. Instead of whining about how offended we all should be and how much this is morally bankrupting America, why not let consumers decide if Rockstar/Take Two should suffer any consequences?

If enough of the squeaky wheels choose not to spend their money on any products from the company, so be it.

While the uproar is a shining example of what’s wrong — and it’s the lack of personal responsibility from parents, not digital fornication in a video game, that we’re talking about — maybe this can serve as the catalyst for parents of underage game players to stop relying on Best Buy, Gamestop and Wal-Mart to slap their children on the hand when they choose a game not meant for their age and maturity level.

Hopefully this happens before somebody chastises Electronic Arts, maker of The Sims 2, for possibly showing nipples and pubic hair.

Too late.

[T Park]

make it for 18 and over.

But if you outlaw it, thats censorship in the bad way.

[SpursWoman]

make it for 18 and over.

But if you outlaw it, thats censorship in the bad way.

Yeah ... it really is a fun game.

[Spurminator]

I'm gonna step out on a limb and play devil's advocate here...

Regardless of whether or not she should have purchased the game for her 14 year old grandson, the ratings system is there to let people know, specifically, what they're getting their child (or themselves) into. Even if we don't think she should have bought her grandchild a "Mature"-rated game, those are her standards and she has a right to them.

The rating is meant to allow parents to make decisions based on the content of the game, even if they are stupid decisions. That is personal responsibility. If a game purports to have one type of content, but contains other content that the parent was not made aware of, that is misleading.

Since she was mislead, I believe her lawsuit is justified.

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

I'm gonna step out on a limb and play devil's advocate here...

Regardless of whether or not she should have purchased the game for her 14 year old grandson, the ratings system is there to let people know, specifically, what they're getting their child (or themselves) into. Even if we don't think she should have bought her grandchild a "Mature"-rated game, those are her standards and she has a right to them.

The rating is meant to allow parents to make decisions based on the content of the game, even if they are stupid decisions. That is personal responsibility. If a game purports to have one type of content, but contains other content that the parent was not made aware of, that is misleading.

Since she was mislead, I believe her lawsuit is justified.

Okay, I'll bite.

At what point of "sexual content" was she misled. In its previous form and rated "M", the game stated that term.

I don't own a legit copy of the game, so I haven't seen the actual definition on the back of the box, but it did state sexual content.

Dependant on what it says on the back, this would apply.

http://esrb.org/esrbratings_guide.asp#symbols

[Slomo]

I believe that was GTA3, I had never heard of it before and had no idea that the game was that bad and wasn't paying that much attention (obviously), aside from the fact that I really like the soundtrack (which up until then was all I heard). I figured the stealing cars part, but not all of that other stuff. But that really threw me for a loop.

It was one of those moments where you know you have to do the "right thing" and lay the hammer down, but you're desperately fighting laughing your ass off.

Maybe that makes me a candidate for Bad Mother O'The Year, but that was pretty damn funny. My only relief was that when I asked, neither one of them knew what a hooker was...just that that's what she was.

I know the feeling You're torn between high fiving them and grounding them until they're 21

[Spurminator]

Well, the Adults Only label specifies "Nudity" and "Prolonged sexual content," so it can be assumed that the sexual content (an admittedly vague term anyway) of a game rated as Mature would not contain nudity.

Of course, we're probably giving her too much credit by assuming she new all of the ratings guidelines...

[midgetonadonkey]

Even in the PS2 version there is a cut scene where some chick is giving a guy head.

[ChumpDumper]

Kids can handle cutting women up with chainsaws and blowing off cops' heads.

It's all good fun.

I crack up everytime I beat someone down with the double-ended dildo.

[Spurminator]

When does this game go Virtual Reality is what I wanna know...