Reply With Quote
He'll be back to playoff form, i.e. costing us championships with his brain-dead turnovers and piss-poor shot selection.
Book it.
Some dumb in this thread
He'll be back to playoff form, i.e. costing us championships with his brain-dead turnovers and piss-poor shot selection.
Book it.
DMCs post is spot on.
Manu walks a thin line of making an incredible play or a re ed play. Teams that are disciplined defensively play the former well (eg Miami) but Manu still tries to make them instead of using restraint.
That said though Manu's shooting looks better this year. He couldn't hit last year and it probably made him make/force plays with his passing even when they weren't there.
Hopefully his more balanced arsenal this year results in less stupid passes.
If that was the case then way Manu didn't cost the Spurs with his TO's 'till last season's finals?
I've explained it already.
Where?
He makes the same passes in the regular season but the Demarcuses and the Sacres don't give a , they just watch it sail through. Take that into a game where every possession is like fighting for your life, and Manu doesn't value the ball so he just flings it and tries to force the action.
Manu's turnovers per 36 minutes of play, over the past 4 years is 3.5. Tony's is 2.8 for the same time period. This is for the playoffs only.
On the other hand, Tony's assists per 36 minutes in the playoffs over the past 4 years is 6.1 while Manu's is at 5.6.
Manu's turnovers per 36 minutes increased significantly after the 2009-2010 season. I haven't been able to draw a correlation with an event, however it could be related to his international play or an injury he sustained.
When did he break his hand?
That doesn't answer my question of "Why Manu's TO's hadn't hurt the Spurs in the PO before to last season's finals?"
These posts are contradictory.
He stopped being an emo drama queen about his role on the team and started being aggressive again. That crap he pulled during the finals pretty much said it all: talking to the media about his role and how Pop said he didn't need to score anymore, which he used to explain why he was being extremely passive. The Spurs obviously need him to score. He proved his point by playing worse than he's ever played in his entire career... and the Spurs lost their 5th championship. Nice work, .
You could say his turnovers didn't hurt the Spurs in the large majority of the playoffs this year as well since they swept two rounds and made the Finals. However turnovers always hurt the team, unless you think somehow Manu has beneficial turnovers.
No they aren't. Having an increase in turnovers doesn't make having turnovers a new thing.
Ever heard of Google?
When will this guy stop sucking Parkers ...Manu has had that role since 2012.
Not all turnovers are created equal, though, tbh. Some get handled cleanly by the other team and lead to fastbreak scores. Other turnovers are sloppy and the opponent can't really turn them into a fastbreak opportunity. Others fly out of bounds and really aren't any worse than a missed shot (except that you don't even have a chance to score if you turn the basketball over).
Some people don't understand that. If you shoot 6-23 is like you had a couple of turnovers (see TP game 6).
In December 14ppg 5 assist 4 rebounds on 52% from the field
He answered it ten times, moron.
HEY IDIOTS.... IF YOU ARE CLINGING TO A LEAD AGAINST A YOUNGER TEAM ON A RUN THEN TIME IS YOUR ENEMY. MANU BRICKING A THREE WITH 20 ON THE SHOT CLOCK IS NOT THE SAME THING AS A SHOT CLOCK VIOLATION. EIGHT TURNOVERS, MOST OF THEM EARLY IN THE SHOT CLOCK, IS WORSE THAN A MISS LATE IN THE SHOT CLOCK.
STUPID PEOPLE WAKE UP!
Ever heard of "Rhetorical Question", ahole? Google that. Moron.
Sounds like Skull-1 is full of Christmas Spirit.
Sounds like Playnan is full of (Christmas)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
