Reply With Quote
If that were the only deal available for Rasho and if not trading Rasho meant not retaining Nazr, then yes. Only reason why though.
No.
If that were the only deal available for Rasho and if not trading Rasho meant not retaining Nazr, then yes. Only reason why though.
True, I guess.
Still no. Guess I'm in the "rather have Rasho than Nazr" camp. Besides, if we trade away Rasho and Nazr gets big minutes at C this year, he is going to cost more than I believe the Spurs will s out come next summer. Rasho is already signed up. But beyond all that, I really don't think Harrington would be good for the team. Not sure I would trade Massenburg for him, let alone Rasho.
I went to the Hawks website a few weeks ago to scout out their 3s for possible trades. One of the main stories was about Harrington and how he thought he figured into the Hawks plans as their 'go to' guy on offense for the coming year.
Whether this perception is correct or not, I doubt he'd be happy coming to the Spurs for another seat on the bench. That's why he forced his way out of Indiana and into a trade.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
