For the record...

[resistanze]

you're re ed tbh, why don't you bring up the 70s nfl while you're at it. Right now, with the league as it is, i can't see a scenario where blabla.. get it?

What the are you talking about?

[djohn2oo8]

He got carried obviously, is anyone claiming otherwise?

So Seneca Wallace or Matt Flynn would have the same winning record as Wilson?

[Lincoln]

What the are you talking about?

Tbh if you took away the name
Of who posted it, it looks like an avante post. Bringing up 70s football and the "get it?" Is very similar to avante.

[resistanze]

Tbh if you took away the name
Of who posted it, it looks like an avante post. Bringing up 70s football and the "get it?" Is very similar to avante.

and the 'blabla'

Raven accidently falling into DD's beartrap as an unintended target tbh

[monosylab1k]

Brady threw 1 touchdown in 3 combined playoff games in his first superbowl run. i thought you would be very familiar with that

But he did send the Raiders wailing and whining to the Tree Of Woe. And they're still crying.

tee, hee

[leemajors]

lol lesser destiny

[J.T.]

Everyone with a half a brain knows Luck > Wilson

[Raven]

What the are you talking about?

what is it that you don't understand?

[resistanze]

what is it that you don't understand?

Your entire post. What are you arguing?

What does Brady in '01 have to do with the 70s? Do you think the NFL today is so far removed from 2001 (which featured the 'Greatest Show on Turf')?
What do you mean by 'right now, with the league...'? If you're implying Wilson needed to do more offensively in today's NFL...you're obviously wrong...as the Seahawks won the Super Bowl.

So what are you trying to say?

[Raven]

Your entire post. What are you arguing?

What does Brady in '01 have to do with the 70s? Do you think the NFL today is so far removed from 2001 (which featured the 'Greatest Show on Turf')?
What do you mean by 'right now, with the league...'? If you're implying Wilson needed to do more offensively in today's NFL...you're obviously wrong...as the Seahawks won the Super Bowl.

So what are you trying to say?

yes i do think the league has changed a lot since the first brady ring, and much more since the 70s, so comparison with those times are pretty pointless, especially when i use the present tense. No i don't think Wilson had to do more, at least not in the sb, i'm not ing about wilson by any means. The point i made at the start was that not anyone agrees that wilson has been carried. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that, i'm just stating it and some don't agree.

[SanAntonioSpurs23]

Everyone with a half a brain knows Luck > Wilson

[Clipper Nation]

Its sad, the team with a lesser destiny and less interesting storylines won.

Yes, one of the youngest teams to ever win the Super Bowl totally has a "lesser destiny" than old-ass Fivehead.... and nobody gives a about "storylines," tbh....

[MeloHype]

Luck also had more turnovers in that one game

[djohn2oo8]

Yes, one of the youngest teams to ever win the Super Bowl totally has a "lesser destiny" than old-ass Fivehead.... and nobody gives a about "storylines," tbh....

This. I'd kill to see my team win a SB and people are in here talking about stats and storylines.

[Avante]

In his final season at Wisconsin RW had a QB efficency rating of 119 that is the highest ever for one season in the history of the NCAA.

In his rookie NFL season he ties the td record held by Peyton Manning, he wins one playoff game and comes within seconds of playing in the NFC le game. He puts up a QB rating of over a 100.

In his second season he becomes the winningest second year QB in NFL history, he puts up another 100 QB rating which is a record and wins a Superbowl.

He has thrown less but has more TD's than Luck, he has a better comp%, he has by far a better QB rating and he isn't throwing SEVEN INT's in but two games.

Nobody in the history of pro football has had a better first two seasons than Russell Wilson, that is a fact and cannot be argued or debated. If he were on the Colts he'd be doing just as well as Luck has done but without all those INT's. He has better wheels, he can make all the throws, and he doesn't have a goofy looking head.

Only a ing moron who knows...0...about pro football could fail to see what is going on here. This lameass......"but he plays on a better team".....big fucling deal, look at at those HALL OF FAME QB's that played on great teams like....

Joe Montana
Bart Starr
Len Dawson
Terry Bradshaw
Jim Kelly
Joe Namath
Steve Young
Bob Griese
Troy Aikman
Terry Bradshaw

How about yanking you pin head out of your blubber ass and look at some ing reality. There is a reason RW has been voted to two pro bowls and Andrew Luck hasn't. And when Luck did replace RW this season what's he do, yep...ANOTHER INT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've seen a lot of ing football, I saw the first game the Seahawks ever played. This kid is special and if you s are too stupid to not see that why am I not surprised?

I'd love for one of you midgets to jump on this, I'll chop ya up into little ing pieces. I'll start by comparing RW's first two seasons against any HOFer.

This was before this seasons playoffs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiJ3jN-sjok

[The Gemini Method]

A team with lesser destiny? Not sure. Seattle can now be written out of the sad sack sports town it once was. I have family in the area and they've been waiting for a long time. It is almost neurotic as in years past I'd get a call from a cousin lamenting the direction of their beloved Mariners and Seahawks. That call I got from him Sunday night--well, that was worth it. That huge monkey on the back? It can now reside on Atlanta or Carolina from now on.

[Chief Brody]

possum up a gumtree, coony on a stump

[spurraider21]

But he did send the Raiders wailing and whining to the Tree Of Woe. And they're still crying.

tee, hee

mono pls