Manu had a very Manuesque game. Simultaneously awesome and ty.
These types of grades..
Manu had a very Manuesque game. Simultaneously awesome and ty.
That's not on Green, wtf? It's not his job to create is own shot. It's Tony and Manu (and Tim's) job to get Danny open looks, and they didn't do that. Danny did not shy away from shooting open shots. He never had the attempt to shoot uncontested 3s to begin with. Most of our offense was isolation (off switches with Tony or Manu taking a big off the dribble, or Tim in the post) or two man games (mostly parker/duncan). We had very little ball movement, and that's on Tony/Manu or that's a credit to dallas's D. That's not on green. Your grades are literally awful.
You need to see a doctor, Danny had 0 TO but he was pretty much 0 at everything.
Manu saved the bench from being completely abysmal. Manu haters in full force, though haha
Patty, Green and Belli, Diaw all pretty much MIA
good job by dallas, spurs need to play better
Manu was great today... kept us in the game for stretches in the second and third quarter when nothing was going in for the bench...
Great to see he still has gas in the tank...
You clearly know jack ing about basketball. Danny doesn't handle the ball. Who's fault is it if he doesn't get open looks?
Yep..I'd say it's more on Carlisle than Tony/TD, tbh..
It's evident that Dallas' strategy was to make the Spurs beat them through Parker/Duncan and isolation plays, limiting ball movement..tough for Green to get going, it's up to Pop to adjust..
Green contributes in other facets, though, unlike Belinelli..
Leonard didn't shut down Ellis, Ellis shut-down himself tbh...Great defence but it was mostly on ellis..
I'd give Leonard a B at most and Tiago deserves a B+
Pop should have called a play or two for Green..Not a single three point play call tbh..Then again it was Dallas plan to make sure the spurs don't shoot threes so it aint too bad I guess...
Green doesn't create his own shots most of the time. The team needs to do that for him. The other players need to look for him. There's no way he should only get two attempts.
He had several strong defensive stretches that did impact the game. There's no way he deserved an F. He's the biggest reason Parker had such an easy time in the first quarter.
Danny can play better, but he definitely wasn't horrible.
He did look good in stretches. If he can find a way to handle the ball against a trap/pressure he should have a good playoff as long as his shot doesn't fade again.
Spurs got by without their key 2d line snipers (Beli, Green, Mills).
It only gets better from here.![]()
Like I said OP - don't want to poo poo on your enthusiasm. I would just focus your efforts somewhere else IMO where you are more comfortable and can bring more value.
Led the team in blocks, had five boards and two steals. In 24 minutes, those are strong defensive numbers.
It seems you donīt know Danny sucked ass which game were you watching? Open looks my ass sometimes big lipped hesitates and instead shooting he makes 2 dribbles and a mid range shoot that usually goes 4/328 times.
It's this kind of analysis based on who you like that lead to evaluating Cam Newton as an elite QB...
DPG with the kid gloves. I like it...
Thanks for the write up, man. Appreciate it.![]()
Actually Dallas designed their defense to make sure the spurs don't shoot as much threes..I agree he should have gotten a couple of playcalls, but he was playing with Leonard, Parker and Duncan..Who gives up touches?
With the way Dallas played defense, the only way Danny gets more than two shot attempts is if he knew how to dribble and post up..He doesn't..
Tim and Tony can't win a game by themselves. Without Manu and Splitter we lose this game since nobody else stepped up. Splitter worked his ass off on defense and was tougher than usual under the basket.
I thought his ball-handling was fine. The only caveat would be that lazy inside pass to Tim.
Manu had 6 boards in 26 minutes so who cares about 2 blocks?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)