The Spurs didn't lose the pick. Since the Suns were good this past year, the Spurs had the rights to their 2005 pick, and traded it to New York as part of the Rose-Mohammed trade.
Isiah Thomas threw away the pick on a bad player, as usual.
This trade would never happen. The Suns would never trade someone of Marion's caliber to the Spurs and Marion's contract is too big for the Spurs to take on. But Spurs fans who say that Marion wouldn't improve the Spurs are nuts. He's averages nearly 18 and 10 for his career.
The Spurs didn't lose the pick. Since the Suns were good this past year, the Spurs had the rights to their 2005 pick, and traded it to New York as part of the Rose-Mohammed trade.
Isiah Thomas threw away the pick on a bad player, as usual.
He, like almost anyone, is much better when not having to go against Bruce Bowen.Marion is a zero when it matters
The Spurs needed to pay him more than 3 millons to bring him to San Antonio.
They know he is good but he might not adjust well to the nba game and if that happens then they have to carry the millons contract for nothing.
Meanwhile Oberto has a similar level to Scola, he is more experienced and will cost less.
Besides we still have the rights for Luis Scola for next year.
Thank you very much. I looked at the draft scroll, and never saw any "from San Antonio" picks, but perhaps they forgot it...or I just missed it. That was a bad trade for New York, considering they might cut Malik soon. I like Malik, but Nazr is a ton better for this team.
Oops, my bad, DON"T BLOW A GASKET! It's an honest typo mistake! I guess we all should emphasize the "R" a little better or give him a nick-name.
The Spurs could only "contribute" per NBA rules, $300,000 towards Scola's buyout with Tau. The Spurs can't buyout anyones contract! It was Scola's responsibility to come up with the rest of his buyout! With the Spurs re-signing Horry and Rasho not traded, this left Scola out of the loop as far as money and positions on the team is concerned. If Scola would have accepted the LLE, and payed his own buyout, he wouldn't have made that much money this year. That's why he's not a Spur this year. Next year his buyout will be much less, and he will be a Spur!
Marion's contract is too damn big for anyone in the league to touch and that's too steep an asking price in your scenario. Besides, the trade would give the Suns a true center and some badly needed depth. Meanwhile the Spurs would get their long three but at the price of handcuffing themselves financially for years to come. Let's learn from the Suns mistakes, not join them.
Well said!My sentiments exactly!
Marion is the best player on the Suns, and the most consistant. The reason why he sucked against the Spurs is easy: Bruce Bowen.
BTW, no way would I do this trade. And the Suns shouldn't either. And they won't. And we won't.
The Spurs would do that deal in a heartbeat.
1 Parker
2 Ginobili
3 Marion
4 Duncan
5 Oberto
I don't think people really understand the cap. First off, we are already over the cap. All we can offer is the MLE. And it doesn't matter how much salary you add, once you are over the cap you have the MLE. Second, draft picks and MIN level players can always be added. So we will always be able to fill out a roster. The question is whether we hit the luxury tax. I am not supporting having a 90 mil roster, but going over the lux tax by 2, 3, even 5 or 6 million is not going to kill us. If it guaruntees that we stay compe ive than do it.
Put Raho in, take Nazi and Brown out.....Scola's worth at least....what....14 million..Haha!
Best player? On a team with Amare Stoudemire and Steve Nash? Hardly. Marion can't even create his own offense.
please I can name at least one team who will swallow up any contract of any size.
No its cool, it just bugs me a lil bit. It has been typed "Nazi" several times here.
Tim called him Nas a few times (or is it spelled Naz?? Wateva).I guess we all should emphasize the "R" a little better or give him a nick-name.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)