Reply With Quote
I learned 2x3=6 when I was 2 years old. Ohio Independent School District failed LeDummy
Dat Kang #23 jersey
Greatest #23 ever
Hopefully the Great Satan has the same type of success he had previously the last time he wore 23.
I learned 2x3=6 when I was 2 years old. Ohio Independent School District failed LeDummy
Dat Kang #23 jersey
Greatest #23 ever
BAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!2 rings, 3 lost Finals... makes sense.
Lebeta
#2-3
You've nary room, your Kirby would have to change his jersey number to 6-24
Kang played in less Finals than Kobe, but he lost MYou've nary room, your Kirby would have to change his jersey number to 6-24
Imagine how many rings he'd have playing with prime Shaq and MVPau/Bynum/Odom.... you wouldn't be light '04 or '08 with Kang in place of Kirby, that's for sureKang played in less Finals than Kobe, but he lost M
He played with Shaq. Didn't end well.Imagine how many rings he'd have playing with prime Shaq and MVPau/Bynum/Odom.... you wouldn't be light '04 or '08 with Kang in place of Kirby, that's for sure
I said prime Shaq, not washed-up Shaq.... -9000000 points for that deflectionHe played with Shaq. Didn't end well.
lol... Riles retires the number 23 in Miami and Lebron switches back. Big " you" to MJ.
It was an awesome tandem when David Robinson and Moses Malone played together.I said prime Shaq, not washed-up Shaq.... -9000000 points for that deflection
Spurs of this year or Lakers of 3 peat years would have stopped those Bulls at least once or twice. I am not underestimating how great those Bulls teams were but theres way too many weapons on these Spurs or the 3peat Lakers.
I would love to have seen wtf MJ would have done against the 2008 Celtics defense or the 2004 pistons defense.
MJ reminds me of Anderson Silva in some ways, ing incredible but in a weak era and we all know if he faced Jon Jones he'd lose 50% of the times even in his prime. Lakers or Spurs are like Jon Jones imo.
Not with Kirby on the team.... he'd try to turn it into a one-on-one contest against DK out of pure ego, ignoring Shaq (like he did in 2004) and preventing the Lakers from exploiting the one major advantage they'd have in that matchup, tbh....
This year's Spurs would have nailed DK to the tree of woe, though
Lakers of those years stomped on the Spurs (inb4 BS excuses) and swept them with ease. Gimme a in break gook. Go buy a 2-3 jerseyNot with Kirby on the team.... he'd try to turn it into a one-on-one contest against DK out of pure ego, ignoring Shaq (like he did in 2004) and preventing the Lakers from exploiting the one major advantage they'd have in that matchup, tbh....
This year's Spurs would have nailed DK to the tree of woe, though
Lakers of those years stomped on the Spurs (inb4 BS excuses) and swept them with ease. Gimme a in break gook. Go buy a 2-3 jersey
CN logic
Spurs of those years would kill MJ's bulls-CN
But Lakers swept them CN - Me
But Kirby has a tape
Lakers of those years stomped on the Spurs (inb4 BS excuses) and swept them with ease. Gimme a in break gook. Go buy a 2-3 jerseyYou specifically said the Spurs of THIS YEAR (as in, 2014) in your original post, now you're moving the goalposts to the significantly weaker Spurs teams of the Lakers' threepeat eraCN logic
Spurs of those years would kill MJ's bulls-CN
But Lakers swept them CN - Me
I also said that THIS YEAR'S Spurs would nail DK to the tree of woe, not the 2000-2002 Spurs.... nice try, though
CN logic
Spurs of those years would kill MJ's bulls-CN
But Lakers swept them CN - Me
'96 Bulls would have SWEPT this year's champs. Only team that could upset that Bulls team would have been the '87 Lakers tbh.You specifically said the Spurs of THIS YEAR (as in, 2014) in your original post, now you're moving the goalposts to the significantly weaker Spurs teams of the Lakers' threepeat era
I also said that THIS YEAR'S Spurs would nail DK to the tree of woe, not the 2000-2002 Spurs.... nice try, though
So then you acknowledge those Spurs wouldnt beat the Bulls from the 2003-2007 championship years?You specifically said the Spurs of THIS YEAR (as in, 2014) in your original post, now you're moving the goalposts to the significantly weaker Spurs teams of the Lakers' threepeat era
I also said that THIS YEAR'S Spurs would nail DK to the tree of woe, not the 2000-2002 Spurs.... nice try, though
Once again, you're moving the goalposts.... your original goalpost move was to the Spurs of "those years" (as in, the Lakers' threepeat years), now you're moving them again to the 2003-2007 championship Spurs
Stick to trying too hard to fit in with Spurfan and overusing the same two schticks, because you're making this too easy....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
