why do you use per 36 as evidence when it is a hypothetical of a prediction? I never understood why per 36 could be useful. I dont want him, even if it means losing errors. His ty FG% and anti-rebounding do it for me.
He has a fine enough shooting percentage. He went 56 percent from two and 37 percent from three last year.
Per-36 stats are important because it helps control for minutes. Lorbek's numbers look bad for a starter, but he was playing bench minutes, and they're fine for someone in that role. Like if Erazem were to come to the Spurs and get eight and three as the fourth big, he'd be a good pickup.
I read he said that he was taking the year off to heal up.....no chance on coming over this year or probably ever.
man i was excited when we traded for him, he was really just filler but i figured he would make his way here....sucks to see that he has declined to scrub status so quickly....
He seems like a massive d-bag IMVHO.
Indeed. But him waiting actually helps his chances, as the Spurs will have the money and roster spots next year.
At this point it seems that Bertans would be a higher priority than Lorbek...
so another spurs stashed player is so banged up, he'll most likely never make it over. wow, what a front office!
Shut up you dumb ! He wasn`t stashed by the spurs, his rights were traded to the spurs in the Paul George trade...
You never heard of him before today.
drafted or traded for... stashed he was, wrong you are.
Discussion about this buy out started in July, both parties were negotiating for a long time. Not a big surprise, He was not part of Pascual's plan for the coming season.
Lorbek in a Spurs jersey are near 0. He is 30 y/o and injury prone.
Good stuff. Thanks for the perspective.
he was stashed by some other team if anything.
it's time
#4daminynot
Hmmm...
Is this guy ready to join the Spurs?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote