He's still more valuable than Horford and maybe even Millsap (but I can understand why someone would disagree with that).
You're literally proving my point that the point guard position is replaceable, dumbass![]()
He's still more valuable than Horford and maybe even Millsap (but I can understand why someone would disagree with that).
Um.
Lillard plays on an offense that is iso-based, but still gets other members involved in his game.
He is averaging 22, 5, and 6 from the field. PER is a 23, third highest in the league for a PG (Curry with 27, Paul with 25). He is also shooting 47% from the field and 40% from three, at a high usage. Oh, and his team's record is 30-9 or something.
Do you try to post stupid ?
That works in the regular season, but won't work in the playoffs when playoff defenses put bigger players on him and the whole offense stagnates.
versus
My work here is done![]()
vs.
My work here is done.![]()
OP also takes a no-name Romanian over Scarlett Johansson, which says enough imho.
You definitely have the tendency towards hyperbole. He's "obviously really good," but you "hate" that people talk about this "damn " being really good. I wonder if your perception of the Atlanta talk is skewed because you're so eager to make the PG-is-not-important argument. I hear lots of TV guys talking about what great and under-appreciated players Millsap and Horford are all the time, and I've heard a bunch of them say Millsap deserves to be on the All Star team. I think the idea that praise of Atlanta is Teague-heavy is mostly in your imagination.
Canadians
30 minutes, +13, 7 assists, holding Brandon Jennings to 1-10, and most importantly: W.
You love being coy!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)