Reply With Quote
hey, im a pacer fan
i think your 3 time finals mvp is "not much better" than my very own JERMAINE ONEAL
ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL!!!
omg
this deserves to be a classic thread
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahaha
TONY PARKER and JAMAAL TINSLEY?
MANU GINOBILI and STEPHEN JACKSON
TIM DUNCAN (!!!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA) and Jermaine "lil " Oneal?
Dude you ARE desperate!
hey, im a pacer fan
i think your 3 time finals mvp is "not much better" than my very own JERMAINE ONEAL
ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL!!!
omg
this deserves to be a classic thread
what makes it so much funnier is that he uses statistical numbers to back up this claim
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahaha
what a
why dont you show us your very own Jermaine Oneal's finals statistics?
or how about compare tony/manu/tim FINALS stats to tinsley/jackson/oneal FINALS stats??
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
ok i'll help you out even more
how about compare career playoff stats
or how about career playoff games PLAYED
LOL!!!! im seriously laughin out loud
Lol!!! Like Omg Being A Raving Idiot Is Funn!
i'm mad about my spurs!
You don't take into consideration that Jermaine was playing with one good arm and Tinsley hadn't played in three months when he took the court against Detroit... and he was still injured too... so playoff stats don't mean to the Pacers... you all are ing blind if you think the Spurs are so much better than the Pacers... ing blind.
What a troll... calling someone a and not debating back makes you look really smart.
the fact that you complain about injuries just proves how much you're NOT used to the playoffs
pacers are not on the spurs level
they wish they were
but they are not
you are a , playoffs is all about endurance
which is why manu was held back the entire season....
duncan played half the playoffs with one bad ankle, and half of it with two bad ankles
dont whine about injuries man...its the 2nd lamest thing besides whining about refs
And you just posted three or four times without giving any evidence at all as to why I am wrong and you are right... other than it makes you laugh... keep on laughing... you look like an idiot.
we'll see who will be laughing at the 2 spurs/pacers games this season
hope you stick around 'til then
Or it could mean that your Spurs have been luckier than my Pacers in recent years come playoff time.
I will... win or lose.
you've used stats to back your claim as to why your trio is almost as good as our trio
its dumb...for one thing you play in a weaker division, weaker conference
spurs played in the most bad ass division last season (this season's best division is open to debate)
its not about luck man....spurs have been injured into defeat many many times before...they coulda repeated in 2000, but duncan was gone...they were screwed that year DA was injured for the whole playoffs...
the thing that has stayed consistent is coaching philsosphy and team spirit
this yeilds yearly results of playoff appearances, yearly championship contenders
Injuries do impact teams... it is not whining... it is stating a fact...
We have the Pistons... name one team in your division tougher than them.
obviously
but its not something that really matters cuz its something that affects all teams
sorry if your players were more fragile than ours this last season, do you want to re-do the playoffs or what
maybe if you had played your trio less minutes in the regular season they wouldn't have broken down (see: spurs)
So you don't think that the Spurs season of injuries was bad luck? It does happen randomly. And the same consistancy has been here in Indiana... we have been one of the top teams in the East since the early 90s.
Very possible.
ok i'll give you your consistency but it is not random that injuries happen
its about managing your team
if rick carlisle had played your guys less minutes in the regular season (at the cost of maybe losing more games) then maybe they would not have broken down and could have stepped up more inthe playoffs
manu played hardly any minutes on the 2nd night of back to backs....we were all pissed, but the strategy paid off like no other when he was fresh for the entire playoffs
its not our fault your team was fragile after busting their ass for 82 games
I don't care about last season... hopefully we will have better luck on the injury front this year... that is all I care about... and no I don't want to redo the playoffs... we still would have been missing Artest
yeah Artest is the bomb...he's like Bowen on 'roids..
But Manu can shift from attack mode to help duncan mode...jermaine never has and never will be able to guard duncan...plus bowen knows alot of jackson (his moves, etc)...they practiced together for 2 years..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions