Another ty prediction by timvp.
It would be interesting to know if Van Horn would have had a different career if he'd ended up in SA.
Another ty prediction by timvp.
No, he still would have stunk it up.
You think? Maybe. I thought he was going to be a better player though.
Nope
Unless another of his alts.
apples
oranges
and the Pacers are dumb for trading Kawhi![]()
It was TonguePunch FartBox
No.
Altho if we were playing Jeopardy, the answer would be "name a game Blake Dumper likes to partake of regularly."
Jeopardy answers have to be in the form of a question.
COME ON MAN!
I didn't want to alter your quote.![]()
Best front officer, possibly ever, and this is a thread....This board is in the crapper.
Scola Thread !!!!
it has been a while, I miss those
2009-2010, 2010-2011
No. Just no.
sure thing brah
That'll go over real well downstairs![]()
Actually, the Spurs could have had Scola but they chose Splitter instead.Retro. "Spurs could have had Scola here. They chose Bonner instead".
That was the calculus, pure and simple.
Splitter messed up the plan by delaying his journey to SA by a year (the team had factored a one year delay, not two).
If you look at the timing, the Spurs drafting Splitter and giving up on Scola was within a very short period of time that championship summer (at least that's the way I remember it, and I'm too lazy to look it up to confirm).
But my clear recollection at the time was that the Spurs concluded that Scola was a demanding prima donna and they cast their lot with Splitter.
Not kidding, at least one ring in those 2 years..
Sorry, but no.
If you say it then I can't disagree...
dumbass who do you think you are? I'm giving my opinion, get your ass out of here..
Quality post. Superb use of adolescent insults and emoticons.
Bravo.
kill yourself tbh
Answering "No. Just no" to an opinion is very mature, you must be 99 years old..
He was expressing his opinion of your opinion.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)