how about this: a pf, going 3-9 making only shots around the rim with 1 rebound 4 turnovers and a block, how does that sound? He also isn't a rookie.
I agree that it's meaningful when a player underwhelms in SL, but there have been countless examples of players dominating SL games and not amounting to anything..
how about this: a pf, going 3-9 making only shots around the rim with 1 rebound 4 turnovers and a block, how does that sound? He also isn't a rookie.
Wiggins, Towns, and Lavine are very promising. I wouldn't mind building a team with that trio.
He is a rookie just like Blake was cuz he didn't play last year and is coming off surgery. It's already noted you think he will bust, So you don't have to beat that drum it's already noted ...as HH says it's still just SL he hasn't played real ball in 9 months.
I was mostly impressed with Lavine and Clarkson ...Towns and Russell flashed some great skill as passers.
Last edited by Killakobe81; 07-10-2015 at 10:10 PM.
who's HR tbh
He Randle
ah, well i don't really consider him under the discussion of "will bust", i already consider him as a bust. He has shown he has 0 potential, now it's more a discussion of being able to stay in the league or not tbh
You full of but duly noted
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)