You're one to talk about learning English words, Rodrigo. You still running every post through Google Translate before posting them shiiiiiiits?![]()
I decree another 3-peat.
--David Stern, 2002
You're one to talk about learning English words, Rodrigo. You still running every post through Google Translate before posting them shiiiiiiits?![]()
You've been reduced to this. Coming from anyone else it would be a sad state of affairs indeed. But....we allow you your sandbox old man. When it's Duncan 6 TOSB 5, the piper will be playing loud and clear. There won't be a place for you to hide anymore.
I look forward to the challenge with equal amounts of both anticipation & determination.
Let us proceed...
They played 6 and 7 in Miami you senile
I understand how the term came about and who came up with it.
That isn't the point. The point is, it is a misnomer. Like I said, a 3-peat would mean that one would repeat 3 times after the initial one, thus having 4.
I'll just bet you do.
I'm talkin' about the Clippers series during your quest for repeat.
ha, ha, you're wrong. I got ya for once. muhahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!
The point I wanna make is that, 3-peat is a different word than repeat. If the word "repeat" has the meaning of "double", then "3-peat" naturally has the meaning of "triple" imho. Why isn't there such a word like 2-peat? Just to describe a team that has won the championship three times in a row, according to OP's logic? Because most people think differently than the OP does. To them, 2-peat has the same meaning as repeat, and hence 3-peat consequently means three times rather than four.
But again, language ain't natural science, but rather a custom gradually formed against the background of a culture. Therefore, a word that's commonly used in your daily life can never be defined so strictly and vigorously like a physical or mathematical term imho.
Baseline- This is a trolling thread & I was just playing along...
I always enjoy your great B.B. takes....![]()
No, because their 2016 pick belongs to Philly now imho.
Yeah you've never had to consider it.
You can repeat the previous year's performance, thus a repeat. You do it again and it's repeating the previous year's performance and the original. You have technically 3 repeats..
1. repeating the 1st year
2. repeating the 2nd year
3. repeating the 1st year again (along with the 2nd year repeat)
If you do 10 pushups, you don't do 9 repe ions.
LAKERS remind of those suckers who continue to buy lottery tickets, when everyone is buying syndicates for the higher oddds...
...you gave your 1st 5th back, daddy. And you ain't ever livin' that down.
Let us proceed...
remind everyone how the lakers gave away 4th twice
They were selling your , stringing your ropes, peelin' your taters.
About the inner workings of this term? No, I don't think about those inconsequential things. Though I bet when you're on your extravagant boat getaways you're thinking of new things to be pointless about out on the dock.
Someone probably beat me to this 30+ posts ago but it's an expansion of the term "repeat." When you repeat, it doesn't mean you've won three and naturally, when you 3-peat, it doesn't mean you've won 4. It also makes sense in that "three" sounds like "re."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)