If 2014 Spurs are #1 then 2013 Heat have to be top 3.
Fortunately, your view is worth less than a sack of diseased . Less than that of a blind, deaf, re ed person. A good rule of thumb is, whatever your view is, the opposite is probably true. er.In my view..the Spurs never had a championship run....
I mean how could you if you never repeated....sure they won championships but it was never a run
I don't see the Sacramento Kings and Trailblazers of the early 2000's
coming from a laker fan, this really means a lot
Well... the weakest Laker team up there beat the second and third best team up there. Kobe beat the Celtics and Spurs in the playoffs.
The End
2012 Heat. Beat the Big 3 still in Boston, physical Paul george led Pacers, and then in the finals beat an OKC team that slapped the best of the west, and who had three guys who only a season or two later would all be top 10 in the league. And not only did they beat them, they administered a backdoor sweep in which they weren't even compe ive by the last game.
And 2003 really looked like a rebuilding year, maybe not from the gutter but at least a few years of mediocrity after cutting ties with mainstays like Antonio Daniels, Terry Porter, etc and handing young Parker the full-time keys at PG... David's back had about had it, and guys like Steve Smith and Danny Ferry were much worse than in 2001-02. In contrast to the 20–4 start the Spurs had in 2001-02, the Spurs were truly mediocre in the first couple months of the 02-03 season, finishing a four-in-five night road trip out East at 19–13 and in a tie with the Suns for sixth/seventh place in the West; extremely underwhelming, and with the worst of the schedule (crazy RRT, other aspects) still ahead of them. Around Christmastime, nobody in SA would have predicted anything better than about a 52-54 win season or so and a second round exit at best.
After all, the 19–13 start had included losses @ Denver (a team with zero talent at the time), @New York & @Atlanta (Leastern bottom-feeders at the time), at home to Seattle (a lottery team), @Golden State and @LA Clippers (bottom-feeders), and @Washington (Leastern lottery team). Nobody in their right mind
Last edited by UNT Eagles 2016; 09-02-2015 at 06:54 PM.
So the first list is basically the list of teams you enjoy more, and it seems to have nothing to do with true greatness.
2004 Pistons were a great great team. I would say that the 2004 Pistons > 2005 Spurs. Regardless, the Lakers losing in the Finals, and especially in such embarrassing fashion, was a huge upset.
:rofl A Lakers team beat a Celtics team and a Spurs team, therefore all Lakers team are better than all Celtics team and Spurs team. Despite the fact that the Spurs AND the Celtics both beat the Lakers team.
You are just horrible at this.
BTW, how about that 4-2 schtick? Want to pull it out now? You've been avoiding me like the plague.
Avoiding you? I can't smell you from here. The Spurs did not beat the Kobe/Pau repeat team. Try again, jackass.
You have been hiding like a little roach. Never even attempted to respond to your highly flawed 4-2 "logic" of yours.
And finally you have pulled in MVPau, but you got the order wrong, it's MVPau/Kobe, not the other way around. And yeah, the Spurs never beat that core, because Kobe was too busy snapping Achilles to avoid the Spurs in the first round.
And, beating a Celtics team missing it's starting center based on a 20+FTA advantage in Game 7, TWO years after the Celtics won the championship when the core of the Celtics were old to begin with.
That team went to 3 straight Finals, dummy. And who the is Perkins sorry ass. We knocked him him... he didn't miss .You have been hiding like a little roach. Never even attempted to respond to your highly flawed 4-2 "logic" of yours.
And finally you have pulled in MVPau, but you got the order wrong, it's MVPau/Kobe, not the other way around. And yeah, the Spurs never beat that core, because Kobe was too busy snapping Achilles to avoid the Spurs in the first round.
And
Yeah, one of the defeated by the Celtics.
Perkins was instrumental in a series against the lakers, because the Lakers were a loaded front court team.
Use your brain sometimes, you are not going to sell it in the used market for a higher price in "mint" condition, like you could with your naruto comics.
Your chasing your tail, kid. That team kicked the out of the Spurs with a prime Parker, Jim and Manu... then went on to defend their le against a team that just two year prior was called great.
You know what two years did to your lakers? Three time defending champs to the lottery. Two time champs to the most disappointing team in the history of the league.
And lol on prime big three. The big three never had their primes at the same time.
1. 2000-01 Lakers
You didn't even play us in 2009 or 2010, and Manu was out in 2009 and Duncan was injured in 2010 (plus Manu's broken nose). Do you even history?
Yeah Duncan never really made a difference for the Spurs did he.
You mean after the Spurs were mysteriously left overnight on a plane in new Orleans and Manu was injured?
We went 9–8 against that particular team in the regular season, from when yall got Pau up through the Bynum for Howard trade.
2001 Lakers had the most impressive record. 2011 Mavs had the most impressive story. 2014 Spurs dominated with the most blowouts. 2008 Celtics probably had the best championship team overall. 2004 Pistons had the biggest upset. All others are meh
And the 2013 Spurs had the biggest choke job of all time.
1) '87 Lakers
2) '01 Lakers
3) '96 Bulls
4) '86 Celtics
5) '08 Celtics
I'd pick the '04 Pistons first reason being I think they could match up pretty well with any team, including the 01 Lakers where I think Prince would prove to be similarly effective against Bryant on d as he was in '04, where he made him look pedestrian. Then I'd go with '14 Spurs, then 01 Lakers. I might put '14 Spurs ahead of '04 Pistons tho
The '14 Spurs were a fluke team that couldn't defend their le. Imagine that team trying to guard Shaq and a prime Kobe. Wake up, got.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
