Good point. If you go by points ratio, Spurs are already better than GS.
It was last year too. Clips just played as Warriors proxy is all.
Good point. If you go by points ratio, Spurs are already better than GS.
Lakers lol
Trollin' ain't easy
GS points ratio: 1.1272 to 1
Spurs: 1.1383 to 1
Spurs > GS.
You're on your own with that. I'm being perfectly clear, that's not what I said.
What I did say was that the Spurs are they kind of team that probably has the best chance against a team like the Warriors in the playoffs. No more, no less.
What? Nobody here gives a about that team of twinks. Streaks are meaningless and they weren't going to go 82-0. I'm looking forward to seeing the Spurs win #6.
Of course not. That's why 6 out of the top 14 threads in the Spurs forum are dedicated to the Warriors. Because apparently, nobody cares. Posters here are so hot and bothered by the Warriors and their success, that Spurs fans can't handle it.
Last edited by Hoops Czar; 12-13-2015 at 02:56 AM.
This is what Ryen Russillo just said on NBA Tonight too. He said their offense hasn't caught up to their excellent defense.
That is what you said without realizing it. Given equal point differentials, as points allowed goes down, points ratio goes up, even allowing points scored going down. In other words, the Spurs can beat GS with clamp-down defense.
In addition: while other sites still have it as a slight gap, net rating is equal according to basketball-reference, expected w-l record (theirs is a whopping 3 games worse than their actual record) is too and they had virtually identical strength of schedules until a few days ago.
In other words, their start has been both overrated and lucky and the Spurs' has been underrated, more so recently, as they've progressively closed the gap on them.
Meanwhile, there's reason to believe the Spurs have another gear, for obvious reasons, while they probably don't and might be in the process of blowing their load before the playoffs even commence.
Means absolutely ing nothing.
What's more interesting is Spurs only have 5 losses and Worriers have 1. Basically 1st seed is still up in the aircrazy
Means rest for starters
What's more, our point differential should be even higher than it currently is, since Pop tends to bench the starters early and have the third-stringers blow the lead.
Pop does this to reduce the injuries and wear on the playoff key guys. If another key guy is discovered in the process and they keep winning? Bonus.
point differential plus road record are very good measures
People talking about how the Spurs "can't win close games" and that the every game is about skill and there's no element of luck:
http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/iso...r&OD=offensive
Game 1 of the season, the Spurs force the ball out of the hands of the guy who's turned out to be the best ISO player in the league this year (Durant) and to Waiters, who is the WORST based on the above - 1/2 the expect PPP as Durant. That's great execution, but awful luck.
Other fun observations from these rankings:
- Kawhi has been a beast both in ISO and post-ups. Duncan great in the post too. Kawhi's also leading the league in spot-up points (guys like Curry obviously have better PPP), and been good on hand-offs - akin to a pick.
- Aldridge is #1 in putbacks by a wide margin. Great to have a guy who can work the offensive glass when that hasn't been a focus in the past, and especially when it works against teams like the Warriors
- Patty leading league in off-screen action (yes, he's an offensive SG in a PG body). Parker and Mills with solid 1.0 PPP as PNR ballhandler.
- Blake and Durant have been beasting this year
It's interesting that the Spurs losses were all close games. But for a play or two, Spurs could be undefeated. And GS has won a few they could have lost.
Spurs should pass Golden State in net rating after this Jazz game.
Spurs now #1 in point differential (13.2 vs. 13.1). Margin is a bit wider if you look at net rating since the Spurs play at a much slower pace than GS.
Galileo is a genius!!!!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)