I know I watch him regularly but when you post a question as your le, you ing answer it.
http://grantland.com/features/analyz...erence-finals/Indiana loved Kawhi Leonard. The Pacers had him about no. 5 or no. 6 on their draft board, and they thought very hard about scrapping the Hill deal and just taking a guy they never expected to be alive at no. 15. “When Kawhi ended up being there, we had to think about taking him,” Morway says. “But we already had Danny Granger and Paul George. That’s what made it a little easier for us.”
you won't find better basketball recaps/takes than bballbreakdown's. not anywhere else on the web, definitely not espn. if he has a video related to the spurs then it's definitely worth the watch.
I know I watch him regularly but when you post a question as your le, you ing answer it.
As posted below, the Pacers very well might have taken Kawhi if they kept the pick. But in basically any draft pick trade, the team acquiring the pick tells the other team who to pick, and if the other team picks a different player the deal is off.
I dont think they would have taken Kawhi. They traded for a point guard in George Hill. Their other need was a center to backup Hibbert. Vucevic was 16th pick in draft. Shumpert was 17th. Either could have been the pick for Pacers.
FWIW For the trade, Spurs are way ahead as Kawhi has been better than George Hill. And as a SF, Kawhi has exploded into a top 10 player as PG has been a volume shooter at 42% for his career.
Paul George destroying the Pacers tonight, tbh..back down to Earth..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)