Jim Loscutoff has 7 rings to Kobes 4.Kobe has as many rangs as the Spurs
That 70% of les is a great stat. IF spurs or Dubs win it only increases. That is why stars are so important. If you get one like Kareem, MJ, Magic, Bird Tim, Kobe , shaq you win les especially if you can add a wing man like Pippen, Mchale, Worthy, Pau etc.
LOL wait you count the les in Minnesota? That would be like the Thunder counting the Sonics le from 79, which they dont, because it didnt happen in Oklahoma, it happened in Seattle lmao
apples to oranges.
OKC are the Thunder.
Seattle was the Sonics.
All that matters is the NBA officially recognizes them all 16. ...wgaf about what a random poster on this forum "decides" even me.
If they only counted the LA les would me saying no wait, they have 16 ... count?
Lakers fans still bringing into the discussion the Mineapolis day... that's quite hilarious tbh
Let's settle it like this
City of Boston: 17
City of Los Angeles: 11
but then again still Celtics 17 > Lakers 16.
The 17th was quite nice tbh... against Lakers when game 6 131-92 happen the biggest beatdown ever in the Finals (
Even with the year 1395 Blankenheim Lakers and Minnesota Lakers wins over all white guys.....
Isn't it still
Celtics 9
Lakers 3?
9>3
Yep at the end of the day they have scoreboard. But 2010 getting our revenge for 2008 was quite sweet. Winning a game 7 to get to 16 was almost as sweet as winning in 1985 at the old Boston Garden. wining that on that floor where we had choked so many times before and as recently as 1984 will always be tops. the WCF in 2000 is just behind that and a close 3rd was game 7 at Staples watching Pierce walk away dejected after Artest sent him packing. Glorious days. I have seen us beat the Celts in 3 different finals with only two losses. The oldtimers saw us get our ass whupped a bunch of times ...
Let's settle it like this
City of Boston: 17
City of Los Angeles: 11
but then again still Celtics 17 > Lakers 16.
The 17th was quite nice tbh... against Lakers when game 6 131-92 happen the biggest beatdown ever in the Finals (
agreed tbh... too bad team was not fully helthy but not taking anything away of 2010 ring... well at least no game during that serie with a point differential of 39 and no blowing 24 pts lead entering the fourth
Explain
Im just teasing .... you didnt say anything to crazy ... but even if your name wasnt the same ... I would have recognized your tone and style. I forget what you were posting on I think the draft thread If I am not mistaken ...
lol, what's your username on there?
I just don't want to draft a QB... can't spend a premium pick on a bench warmer when we're trying to win it all right now with the core we have. Just need to improve on defense and then stay healthy.
I used to post as bigDynasty its the only place i dont use killakobe81 ...bit i couldnt remember the password lol.
Revenge yes, but that 2010 Celtics team was not on the same level of the 2008 team. It would have been cool to see them they play in 2009, that Celtics team was playing very good until Garnett got could hurt.
Trying to rob the good people of Minneapolis of their five rings. George Mikan is turning over in his grave.
Whatever, I've been pining to get Hardy back and more than half the board agrees with me. Without a legit pass rusher at RDE we're back in 8-8 territory again.
I saw that too. I would want him back at the right price ...but I hear he was an asshole to deal with. My guess is your other team the Spurs wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole.
Eh... they had Stephen Jackson, Nazr Mohammed, Nick Van Exel, Rod Strickland and even Dennis Rodman in the franchise's history. Aside from that, that's not the point... the Cowboys need to rush the passer to win in the playoffs.
Most of those were pre rodman ...what was the isseue with Nazr?
lol... out of those, only Strickland was pre-Rodman
Meant post, with a ? ...but you already answered ...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote