And you had to start a new thread for this?
From now on:
New thread that need to be merged = revocation of thread starting privileges.
Bravo sir bravo
Porker police called.
Well thought out post with numbers to back it up and we got MODs in here relegating.
Their ass cheeks are crying a river over that trash canPorker police called.
Don't be an idiot. It has nothing to do with Parker and everything to do with people who think that every unoriginal thought they have deserves a thread. The OP could have gone in any of the Parker sucks thread and reached its audience, but that would have meant resisting the urge to be an attention .Porker police called.
So I just cleaned up the Kawhi threads and now the new rule is in force.
do people not know how to write anything other than blocks of text? Christ.
Promises...
If there's one thing that everyone here should be aware of, it's when and how to use ellipses.
the grizzlies are a good hard-nosed physical defense.... good practice for the Spurs.
besides, it is only human nature for players to take it easy given that (1) it is a blowout and (2) even if it is close, the Spurs will win.
right now, I would hope the offense was better, but I can't really complain.
most Parker haters are Nono trolls but this one is a real poster... Which makes him a special kind of got tbh
Wow, regardless of whether you agree or disagree, have to respect OP's passion for the Spurs, tbh
Good thread, and it got a meltdown out of a few posters too.
OP is right....
no one can prove him wrong...
Lots of ing words, so I skipped to what you thought was important enough to bold: "And a negative at that...the ONLY negative on the team. His Box Plus-Minus...get this...is a NEGATIVE 6.1 (-6.1)...WTF. Aldridge is before his at (-.9)...that means he's worse by OVER SIX TIMES the next worst player."
So the proof for your argument includes saying that LMA is the second-worst player on the team? LOL... you actually posted those exact words, and expect people to take you seriously? I don't give a flying what "stats" you drug up, you're take on what they mean is . Bottom line - Parker may suck, but not as bad as you.
I hope you have the time to follow up with it, Slomo. It would improve this place tremendously. I've said it before, but there are a few people who think that ever time they fart, it deserves it's own thread. It would be nice not to have to wade through so many of those, to see if there is actually anything new being posted about the Spurs - and not just crap about the person who made the thread.
BTW - there are a few very lucky people here. A lot of places, attacking a mod publicly like that is an automatic trip to Ban Camp. You're a lot more tolerant than most.
Attacking a MOD?I hope you have the time to follow up with it, Slomo. It would improve this place tremendously. I've said it before, but there are a few people who think that ever time they fart, it deserves it's own thread. It would be nice not to have to wade through so many of those, to see if there is actually anything new being posted about the Spurs - and not just crap about the person who made the thread.
BTW - there are a few very lucky people here. A lot of places, attacking a mod publicly like that is an automatic trip to Ban Camp. You're a lot more tolerant than most.
You sure as don't understand humor, got.
Porker police called.
If saying "porker police" is attacking I don't know what to tell you, marshmallow.
OP dropping truth bombs left and right.
Imagine how many rings the Spurs would have won if they drafted Mehmet Okur instead of Porker in 2001
You are right. Instead it's whining and martyrdom syndrome. You might not believe it, but it's possible to write a well thought post to start a thread instead of an emoticon or call out, or a emotional screed.If saying "porker police" is attacking I don't know what to tell you, marshmallow.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
