Reply With Quote
bumble
Oh...I didn't actually her. I paid her to let me watch her and my dog make love.
Admittedly a dark time in my life.
bumble
Ghost mod got butt-hurt. It happens when a bit of truth gets leaked out on this site. I've had threads deleted and thread les edited for their amusement.
You can go find threads with " got" in the le and yet you'll get your thread deleted or edited if you use the term. I got edited in the post itself for saying it, and two threads down it was in the thread le.
wwwwwwwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmmmmmbbbbuuuulllAAAAAA AAAAAAnnnnccceeeeeee
SpursforSix just probably get banned for being such a dumb troll in so many threads like this. Serious question deserves a serious answer, Ghazi. Ignore the trolls.
So anyways:
OKC - going the way of the dodo. Stereotypically good for better matching but tougher to get responses. Free of charge, you get to read all their personality, lifestyle, ideology, psychological and "situational" questions that they've answered -- some girls have answered 160+ pages worth of those questions, it's crazy. The site has changed quite a bit and the interface is no longer so popular with most, and consequently there are generally less users on there than other leading dating sites. One advantage is you see when the last person was online to the minute, unlike POF and most dating sites. Was much better early in the 2010s until about 2013. Pictures can be hard to get to, messaging interface is painful scrolling if you ever have any long messages or a lot of messages... I don't really recommend it.
POF - a decent bet for meeting a wide variety of females, but even so don't expect too high of a response rate because it's still a free dating site with women with unrealistic expectations. You likely will get more info based on the person's profile, but you can't read their match questions without paying. Message interface is much more user friendly. An unfortunate disadvantage is that unlike OKC, sexuality is not listed on POF profiles, so you sometimes have to hope that they're not trans-sexual/trans-gender (believe me, there are many though they typically say it up front and it's pretty obvious), or bisexual or pansexual or whatever (unless you're into that). I do think that POF will net you a greater chance to actually meet a highly attractive close-enough-to-perfect "dream" girl who wants you back, if you write them a well-thought out and well-written message, especially if you're patient (may take a few months!) and/or willing to drive a bit. Tip for POF: Make use of the "Advanced Search" option, it is free and allows you to set a LOT of filters. If you have a lot of dealbreakers (as I do) make sure to increase the distance radius to at least 25 or even 50 (or else you won't get any legitimate matches).
Tinder - never tried because it's a phone-only application, and I don't have internet on my phone, but I've heard mixed reviews about it. Stereotypically (partially due to the "app" culture), this app is most likely out of all dating "sites" to lead to hookups, rapes, and/or catfishing. Could be worth a try.
Zoosk - It's got a unique interface with the ability to look up people online at all times and even try to chat with them... very little else is free, however. Seems more like a 90s or early 2000s chat room based site than anything. You're very unlikely to get responses with the free version of the site alone.
Paid dating sites - are probably your best percent chance for finding someone online for a serious relationship and marriage, as people are serious, mature, and know what they want. The attractive guy to attractive girl ratio is much more favorable for us guys, and there are actually (gasp!) quite a lot of attractive, normal, childless, baggage-less women on there because they simply don't have time to go out and meet guys in person, many of which are young professionals (age 23-29) who don't have children and are interesting in finding a serious and great man to settle down with. There are tons of weirdos on free sites to sort through, but that's the nature of the beast. However, I never liked the idea of paying for a "maybe" in any cir stance -- especially paying to find someone to date, as by extension it is a form of pros ution (to me). But that's just my opinion and I don't like doling out my money until I actually have someone I'm close to. And I never use my credit/debit card online. Still, just because it's a paid dating site doesn't mean you won't get rejected or heartbroken and have buyer's remorse over paying for a service that net you nothing, so I don't take that kind of risk.
So when MultiModerator censures you it's different.
They actually censored me. I don't start threads about it so yeah it's way different it seems.
Did you lose the ability to start threads?
No I just didn't feel it was that important. I made a comment in passing which is completely different than going on a crusade about it.
So you are dissatisfied over having one post deleted when it was clearly against forum rules.
Yet you are attempting to preach to me over having my thread starting abilities limited. Why limited? Because I started a thread with a poll asking forum participation asking if Coach Pop could match wits with Billy Donovan. We saw the results of that series.
Leading to some mod
leave my Gregg Popper alone
Pharking unreal.
I do agree the double standard is lame. So we are in principle talking about the same thing.
Apparantly they are in The Cornhole Club and you are not. ?
No, they can't see everything. Same with traffic cops.
Pretty sure that was just the straw the broke the fat camel's back.So you are dissatisfied over having one post deleted when it was clearly against forum rules.
Yet you are attempting to preach to me over having my thread starting abilities limited. Why limited? Because I started a thread with a poll asking forum participation asking if Coach Pop could match wits with Billy Donovan. We saw the results of that series.
Leading to some mod
Pharking unreal.
Would you like a washcloth to wipe off from slurping?
Oh I see.
And it was a "straw" because?
And all the previous straws were?
I'll just use the one you've been wiping your tears with.
Well this is probably oneOh I see.
And it was a "straw" because?
And all the previous straws were?
Straw, goalpost move, avoidance.
The gamut.
It's cool. You want to maintain your freedom so don't want to truth out. Understood, accepted.
POF I've had no success with whatsoever. I've only been able to meet black girls off there and none of them were any good.
Tinder I only met one girl off of ever. I happened to get laid with her, but ever since... it's been a colossal dryspell
Match seemed to show some promise... I met 3 girls off there but none amounted to anything... but I think match is the best site yet they've had my "Verify Photo ID" pending for like a week now.
Guys... Ghazi wants a partner
Online dating websites are a scam. It is not much better than blind dating. I remember watching a program about those websites and their effectiveness, and hands down, flirting with "friends of friends" you dont know yourself on Facebook is much more successful compared to the match.com method of approaching total strangers.POF I've had no success with whatsoever. I've only been able to meet black girls off there and none of them were any good.
Tinder I only met one girl off of ever. I happened to get laid with her, but ever since... it's been a colossal dryspell
Match seemed to show some promise... I met 3 girls off there but none amounted to anything... but I think match is the best site yet they've had my "Verify Photo ID" pending for like a week now.
Guys... Ghazi wants a partner
Of course if you have no friends and tremendous social anxiety, blind dating might be more effective. Personally i consider those sites basically a cleaned up craigslist personals lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions