Spurs are probably going to offer him the Jamal Crawford contract (3yrs/42 mill) if the cap jumps to $107-110.
That's the only thing I didn't wanna touch on, was the money. I think he would be willing to do it though, he'd like to raise his son in Texas.
Spurs are probably going to offer him the Jamal Crawford contract (3yrs/42 mill) if the cap jumps to $107-110.
Jamal Crawford isn't worth half that. Inefficient chucker that causes the rest of the bench unit to lose interest, and no defense. Hill would be much much better.
LOL... he looked too much like that fruity guy who was a backup dancer for Madonna. I couldn't stop thinking that when I saw him with that hair.
Of the non-star level PG's, Hill is pretty damn steady. I'd obviously like to have even better than him, but yeah I'd be glad to have him on the team right now. Next year too, I'm sure. Like everything else, it still depends on the cost though.
Except that's what Doc Rivers gave Crawford yesterday.![]()
give me GHill back any day ... from a defensive point having Hill, Kawhi and Green on the floor sounds awesome tbh
I'd take him as a 6th man, but not as starting PG. Would 100% be on board with him back to the Spurs on that condition.
People complain about how much Parker is making - imagine if he had gotten a Crawford deal at 36 (!). At least Parker's way more efficient offensively and isn't in his late 30s starting a new deal.
Love to have him coming off the bench
Meh...Hill is really a 2 in my book. Just not a good enough shooter or big enough to justify being a 2. A tough, scrappy player, but I wouldn't make him my starting point guard. I'd rather keep this 40% version of the "player formerly known as Tony Parker" we currently are stuck with.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)