Reply With Quote
but he didn't, did he!!? So quit making up, and face facts!
Ducks... you're beyond help
but he didn't, did he!!? So quit making up, and face facts!
spurs would not have had moeny for manu had they signed kidd......
answer the question!
would the nuggets won it all with manu last year?
Maybe they could have beaten the Spurs, imagine the team with Jason Kidd running the point... what do you think? would that be an improvement from Tony?
if the spurs had amare instead of manu they would have won it all last year easily
First, that's bull .
Second, answer the question.
'an improving Mohammed"
He's been in NBA 7 years, he's 28, what you see is all you're ever gonna get. He may understand the Spurs defense a bit better this season, but that's all.
Nazr may remain the starter, but Fabri will outhustle and outplay Nazr for more MPG.
If the Spurs had a healthy David Robinson in his prime, they would have crushed all compe ion aswell, what's your point??
dumbest post ever!
And if the Spurs had drafted MJ they would have more rings now...what's the point?
Answer this:
Maybe the Nuggets could have beaten the Spurs, imagine the team with Jason Kidd running the point... what do you think? would that be an improvement from Tony?
That's a tough question, huh? If you say yes, you are underrating your boy Tony (and apreciating Manu, something you rarely do), if you say no, you are contradicting your previous point where you said that there are better players than Manu at a cheaper price.
Not only would the Spurs not have won, they would have been swept. Manu saved our asses in games 1 and 2.
So yeah, it was a pretty bad post.
I seriously think it's a real duck posting on here.
kidd was not that much better then tp last year
this is not a point guard o system
kidd is better at assist but he would be limited with the spurs
Last year Parker was the Argentines' anti-Christ. Looks like this year they'll be targeting Duncan.
That's a great question, I would like to see Ducks answer that one... Ducks, do you think Kidd is better than Parker? Personally, I don't, but maybe you have a different opinion
no, Duncan is the man. We're justt targeting Ducks' stupidity.Last year Parker was the Argentines' anti-Christ. Looks like this year they'll be targeting Duncan.
aye, I second that notion
dcuks, you've gotta be ting me
NO Duncan, no second round
The vote accurately reflected who deserved the MVP award.
no duncan no finals
spurs would have been to finals without manu!
Yes TD is the man. Remember, Manu's great but there are probably five or six players that could have taken Manu's place and gotten the Spurs a trophy. Nobody, not KG, not Shaq, nobody could have replaced TD and gotten the Spurs the rings. TD is MVP.
That's retarted.
Anyone who thinks Manu should have gotten Finals MVP is a dumbass.
So there you go...you can't find what Manu brings at his price. Jeez, I can't believe we are still arguing about this. The guy finished with one of the highest Efficiency ratings per minute played in the Playoffs, he was the team's top scorer in many games (with an insane FG% for a Guard), played awesome defense, made clutch plays, created points in critical moments when no one else was hitting a jumper. And he even accepted coming from the bench.
Seriously ducks, cut the crap, it's ok if you hate Manu, but at least bring a decent take. I don't know, talk about his hair, or go all-George Karlesque on us and complain about his flops, but you can't possibly argue what he meant for the Spurs winning the Larry O'Brien last season.
remember, Manu's great but there are probably five or six players that could have taken Manu's place and gotten the Spurs a trophy.
picnroll gets it
we have a winner!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions