Reply With Quote
You've gotta be 35 years of age and native born and get the nomination.
Those are the only qualifications to be US President.
To my mind Donald Trump is facially disqualified on the basis of lacking character, temperament and judgment, but his supporters think otherwise and nominated him, so Trump -- much as it pains me to say -- is de facto qualified to run for president as well.
The decisive determination is a political one, the party's nomination. All other qualifications are more or less subjective.
You've gotta be 35 years of age and native born and get the nomination.
Those are the only qualifications to be US President.
Hillary's email "problem" is totally bogus, totally fabricated, hyped by the desperate, misogynist Repugs.
The wonderfully effective Repugs campaign of fabricated personal destruction even has somewhat rational assholes here saying Hillary should have not run. WTF? really?
At a minimum, HRC's email problem is colossally stupid and goes to her competence and judgment. At worst, it's criminal furtiveness.
Pretending there isn't even any smoke here is a special kind of obliviousness.
(let the record reflect I've just scourged an HRC supporter for his/her idiocy)
Other (Repug) politicians have done the same, including Bush's Brain deleting 2M emails to cover up the US Atty business. how are those not "Federal records". as Chaffetz calls them?
The Benghazi/email destroy-Hillary Repug fabrications are completely bogus since they concentrate only on her and ignore all the other Repug politicians, Federal and state, who have done the same, if not worse.
Whine Hole, you're totally suckered and conned by the Repugs.
one investigation of Benghazi would have been enough, I agree that the House GOP has discredited itself there.
that said, other politicians doing the same thing as HRC has no bearing on the propriety of HRC doing it.
do you think what HRC did was right and proper? not furtive or irresponsible in the least?
HRC did nothing wrong, is your view, correct?
horrible take.
HRC didn't nothing any more wrong than Repug and other politicians who used non-govt email for govt business.
The Repugs selecting ONLY HRC as a criminal and hyping it insanely, to great effect in your case, is NOTHING but pure politics of personal destruction of the Dem candidate they LOVE to hate and can't possible beat electorally, can't beat Dems on the policies and governance.
the FBI thought it was worth their time -- was that pure politics of personal destruction too?
you don't think she did so deliberately to keep her official work hidden from the public?HRC didn't nothing any more wrong than Repug and other politicians who used non-govt email for govt business
nothing fishy about the deletions or smashed Blackberrys?
you can hardly call yourself impartial if you deny HRC's actions create an appearance of impropriety.
don't you agree it's part of the professionalism expected of high-government officials that they strive to avoid even the appearance of impropriety or conflicts of interest, and that HRC has manifestly failed to do so in this case?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
