Reply With Quote
what's he gonna do, SnakeBoy?
do share your thoughts, if you have any.
o
what's he gonna do, SnakeBoy?
do share your thoughts, if you have any.
L
What you want me to put my thoughts into a single coherent post?
he;s already put off his big talk about it. he's obviously struggling to understand what the job means.
whatever floats your boat. did you have a point?
No, no point at all.
wait and see.
is Trump too good to put the country before himself. or at least decently pretend to?
*too
yeah, did you have a point?
if you think Trump's business interests aren't a vulnerability you're blind.
if he's already too rich to care, he should divest.
but he isn't. and that's a vulnerability. for all of us.
Donald will just have to sit back and take the body shots.
Come clean or tough luck. You will be questioned. You will be president.
The temptation to break every norm must be great, but doing so has implications beyond the personal ambition of Donald Trump.
If he does nothing to distance himself from the perception of self-dealing he becomes actually corrupt in the eyes of of the country (a big part of it, at least) and the whole world.
In essence, he'd be staking the reputation of the country, and his legitimacy, and domestic tranquility, merely to enlarge his own estate.
We'll see what he does. Handing it over to his family won't cut it.
Last edited by Winehole23; 12-13-2016 at 11:51 PM.
By not divesting himself of his estate, Trump puts the country at hazard. If they can squeeze the President, they squeeze us too.
Je suis l'etat? Maybe he thinks he's Napoleon.
He'll soon have a of a lot more power than Napoleon did.
Last edited by Winehole23; 12-14-2016 at 06:45 PM.
So, all you have is ad hominem?
http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-hominem.htmlDescription of Ad Hominem
Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person."
An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her cir stances, or her actions is made (or the character, cir stances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:
Person A makes claim X.
Person B makes an attack on person A.
Therefore A's claim is false.
Please try again, with a response that actually addresses the issue, dumbass.
That one of Trump's business partners was arrested is not exactly hard to verify.Well, when the guy reporting it has a history of peddling fake news, then yes, it's easy to know that it's probably BS. The left is truly getting desperate if they're scraping the bottom of the barrel for Kurt Eichenwald.
If you can get off your lazy ass to do so, sure. Pardon us if no one holds their breath waiting.
Do you think Trump handing his business over to his children solves anything, Snake Boy?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
