Dunleavy was a solid coach, maybe not Hall of Fame worthy but he was great. There's certainly worse coaches you could have at your disposal.
Seriously...
Dunleavy was a solid coach, maybe not Hall of Fame worthy but he was great. There's certainly worse coaches you could have at your disposal.
Why do you and your fellow fans love child molestors, tbh?![]()
This is true, but the argument that's silly from "Today's NBA camp" is the assumption that the greats from past eras wouldn't be able to adapt, thinking that because we're in the "amazing" 21st century with Chinese made smartphones a player from the 80s or 90s would be as obsolete as a 486 Computer. That logic is horse .
Chart the career of any great (in any sport). They usually have no problem adapting through their 10-20 year career. Larry Bird came in '79, already "old" at 23 in his rookie year, and he had little problem adapting to the athletic style of basketball that players like Jordan, Barkley, 'Nique, Drexler spearheaded. In 1992 he was 35 with no back, the league was more athletic and above the rim than ever, and Bird still averaged a respectable 20ppg, 9.6rpg, and 6.8apg on 46%. Magic came back from a 3 year layoff, HIV infected, and still put up respectable numbers in '96. We've seen Duncan adapt seamlessly to about 4 different eras. Football: Tom Brady and Jerry Rice.
Certain players wouldn't have a place today, the enforcers and such, but a great would be great in any era up to a point (I don't see a player like Mikan being great in any era, for example).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)