Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 43 of 43
  1. #26
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Google has many warnings. Its illogical they would use the "phishing" warning for sites not having https. Makes no sense.

    Its like using a Stop sign when you want the driver to detour to a side road.
    There are many ways a website can be compromised, chrome's warning list a few, but doesn't mention phishing (which usually attack by email, not by website)




    iow, you're full of naive bull

  2. #27
    hasta la victoria, siempre cheguevara's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    9,763
    The article you posted was strictly referring to http vs https

    You are way out if your league. Go back to your Netscape browser

  3. #28
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    The article you posted was strictly referring to http vs https
    Encouraging websites ALL to use HTTPS exclusively is exactly what Google wants. The browser side irrelevant. Stay in the baby pool.

  4. #29
    hasta la victoria, siempre cheguevara's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    9,763
    Encouraging websites ALL to use HTTPS exclusively is exactly what Google wants. The browser side irrelevant. Stay in the baby pool.
    Using https and having phishing content are mutually exclusive

    Go back to searching for knowledge on Alta Vista

    Maybe u can post about it in your Geocities page

  5. #30
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Using https and having phishing content are mutually exclusive

    Go back to searching for knowledge on Alta Vista

    Maybe u can post about it in your Geocities page
    Encouraging websites ALL to use HTTPS exclusively is exactly what Google wants. The browser side irrelevant. Stay in the baby pool.

    you brought phishing, I didn't and neither does the Chrome warning popup

  6. #31
    hasta la victoria, siempre cheguevara's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    9,763
    Encouraging websites ALL to use HTTPS exclusively is exactly what Google wants. The browser side irrelevant. Stay in the baby pool.

    you brought phishing, I didn't and neither does the Chrome warning popup
    I brought up Phishing???

    the spurstalk warning IS ALL ABOUT PHISHING


  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    LOL this has nothing to do with changing to HTTP or whatever. The warning only pops up when browse to here. Doesn't happen to all sites which it would if indeed that was what google was trying to do.

  8. #33
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    LOL this has nothing to do with changing to HTTP or whatever. The warning only pops up when browse to here. Doesn't happen to all sites which it would if indeed that was what google was trying to do.
    I think it recognized that you're probably a got.

  9. #34
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    I think it recognized that you're probably a got.
    Bend over, I'll show you a got.

  10. #35
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    Bend over, I'll show you a got.
    Did you think this one through before posting

  11. #36
    hasta la victoria, siempre cheguevara's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    9,763
    Bend over, I'll show you a got.

  12. #37
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Bend over, I'll show you a got.
    Your capitulation is duly noted.

  13. #38
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    The article you posted says they would mark it with a red cross next to the URL

    The message when users hit Spurstalk is completely different it specifically says the site is deceptive. Totally different thing

    My guess is our site was blacklisted due to the search results it produces through google. Most likely the NSA has algorithms that automatically blacklist sites. Probably the content of the Political Forum would trigger the NSA blacklist method.

    This is all related to NSA and US government shutting down their so called "fake news" sites bull

    I would not be surprised if the Pizzagate thread itself singlehandely triggered this site. It will be hard for anyone to have spurstalk removed now
    I would suggest the reason is so many members here, posting links that are harmful sites.

    We have so many unethical members here, its ridiculous.

  14. #39
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    If visitor opts to proceed past the warning, Chrome replaces the URL/search bar with a red (warning sign + "Dangerous")

    If ST owner would buy/install a cert, the Chrome warning would disappear, proving my points, proving you're wrong.

    That so many sites had the danger warning on day Google started its project, you might have point, but you don't.
    I suspect what you are claiming would be illegal.

  15. #40
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    I brought up Phishing???

    the spurstalk warning IS ALL ABOUT PHISHING

    ... bull , the word isn't mentioned in list of problems a compromised website.

  16. #41
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    I suspect what you are claiming would be illegal.
    ...because you don't have clue.

    All the sites not yet upgraded to HTTPS cause the warning in chrome. How is that illegal? The visitor isn't blocked, just WARNED.

  17. #42
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Will your website lose 'secure' status from Google? Here's a quick fix.


    Namecheap is stepping up to offer free replacements for SSL certificates—issued by other vendors—that will be nullified by Google Chrome developers.

    http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passc...-s-a-quick-fix

  18. #43
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    ...because you don't have clue.

    All the sites not yet upgraded to HTTPS cause the warning in chrome. How is that illegal? The visitor isn't blocked, just WARNED.
    I'm not using Chrome.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •