If the Celtics Can Win a Game Without Isaiah Thomas...

[therealtruth]

Celtics have a player in Horford that can make an impact in the post.

The Spurs should have got him instead of LA. He makes the other players better.

[tbdog]

Spurs are also missing their PG and now their backup PF, to go along with our star. Celtics also have 2 capable scorers in Bradley and Horford. We have one in LMA. Regardless, we also would need a role player to have an outburst game. Today Smart scored 28 points and hit 7 out of 10 threes. He shot 28% from downtown this season.

For the Spurs to win, LMA would need have a good scoring outfit. Gasol would need to put up good numbers. And Green or Simmons would need to have an outburst. Plus we will need to defend. All in all, the Celtics team has more options without their star than ours.

[EIC]

Celtics without IT are much better than Spurs without Kawhi (and Parker and Lee). Only hope at this point is that Curry or Draymond break an ankle in the first half of Game 4.

[cd98]

First I.T. is such a defensive liability against Cavs that they are probably better without him.

Second, GSW are BETTER than the Cavs. Way better.

[r0drig0lac]

it's embarrassing tbh

[-21-]

Tony & Kawhi >>>>>> IT

GSW >>> CLE

/thread

[Play Boban]

Tony & Kawhi >>>>>> IT

GSW >>> CLE

/thread

SA >>> BOS

/thread

[KDKSpurs24]

Boston scrapped their way back into the game but it was also more about the Cavs being disrespectful. Also Lebron not playing well for the first time in a long time. This only makes it more difficult for us because Golden State won't underestimate us like Cleveland did Boston.

[rjv]

this weeks specious reasoning thread of the week award goes to...