Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 84
  1. #26
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    The Start Simmons crew is just as bad as the start paddy krew.

  2. #27
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    He's a mediocre journeyman, if the Spurs commit even mid level money to him on a multiyear contract, it would be one of the dumbest things they would ever do. Dude doesn't have much more to provide than what we already saw, and what we already saw isn't even that good to begin with. Spurs don't overpay for mediocre players, don't start doing it now.

  3. #28
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    so then it would really be a battle between hanga and manu for a roster spot then (assuming manu elected not to retire).
    The tweet from Pincus said that Spurs are only signing him if Manu retires. Very specific.

  4. #29
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Better than Green. But again, who isn't?

  5. #30
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,068
    Simmons is a decent role player and certainly deserves reserve minutes. Shouldn't be a starter on a team with championship aspirations.

  6. #31
    The St. Croix Boy duncan2k5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    5,962
    If Green can start, so can Simmons...Green is so immensely overrated on here...I'm tired of watching him get blown by on defense, clank threes, and struggle to dribble and pass...Dude had an entry pass picked off for goodness sakes...Even if Simmons is our SG off the bench, I dont want Green starting...I think every team in the NBA chooses Simmons over Green based on this past season...Green is too easy to defend vs the good teams...

  7. #32
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Shouldn't be a starter on a team with championship aspirations.
    The exact same thing I say about D-League Green.

    He shot 33.2% from three last season and his slurpers thought LASIK surgery would fix his broken ass jumper. Then followed it up by shooting 33.3% from three this calendar year, and shot 34.2% from three in the playoffs. His "defense" got torched by every single player he guarded until Kawhi and Simmons took his assignment.

    Props to him for conning a team into paying him $10,000,000/yr though

  8. #33
    The St. Croix Boy duncan2k5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    5,962
    The exact same thing I say about D-League Green.

    He shot 33.2% from three last season and his slurpers thought LASIK surgery would fix his broken ass jumper. Then followed it up by shooting 33.3% from three this calendar year, and shot 34.2% from three in the playoffs. His "defense" got torched by every single player he guarded until Kawhi and Simmons took his assignment.

    Props to him for conning a team into paying him $10,000,000/yr though

  9. #34
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    The exact same thing I say about D-League Green.

    He shot 33.2% from three last season and his slurpers thought LASIK surgery would fix his broken ass jumper. Then followed it up by shooting 33.3% from three this calendar year, and shot 34.2% from three in the playoffs. His "defense" got torched by every single player he guarded until Kawhi and Simmons took his assignment.

    Props to him for conning a team into paying him $10,000,000/yr though
    Do you have anything to back up your arguments or just your usual eye test garbage, tbh?

    He shot 38% from 3 which is well above average..he didn't shoot well in the playoffs, but if you're going to go that route, why ignore that he shot 50% from 3 in last year's playoffs?

  10. #35
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Do you have anything to back up your arguments or just your usual eye test garbage, tbh?

    He shot 38% from 3 which is well above average..he didn't shoot well in the playoffs, but if you're going to go that route, why ignore that he shot 50% from 3 in last year's playoffs?
    I brought up %'s... forgot vanilla posters hate single category %'s and prefer TS

    37.9% to be exact, which was insanely inflated because of his first 10-15 games of the season. That's why I said "calendar year" since he was below average most of the season.

    Green shot like in 2 out of the last 3 playoffs. Let's just ignore the constant mediocrity and highlight his one good year then. Let's not mention he shot worse from three these playoffs than broke jumper having Simmons...

  11. #36
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    Even if you think Simmons is or can be better than Green, starting him is a terrible idea IMO..for Simmons to be effective, he needs the ball in his hands..he has looked horrible as a role player during his time as a Spur, it's not his role, he needs to be a high-usage type like a Lance Stephenson or Tyreke Evans..

    It's not a coincidence that his breakout games usually involve Kawhi, Parker or Manu not being on the court with him..his usage rate in the playoffs was 23.3%, there's no way he would ever approach that with Kawhi and Aldridge on the floor..

    Simmons' usage rate with Aldridge and Kawhi on the floor was 12%, this season..completely wastes his offensive ability..if you're going to pay him and commit, he needs to take over Manu's bench anchor role and allow him to run the offense..

    Yep. I do think that people here underestimate his defense - especially in the playoffs. I spent some time keying on just him, and he was pretty damn good. He also got a lot better about fouling. Not making as many stupid ones, and actually making some smart ones at the right time. But unless he learns to shoot the 3 a lot more consistently, having him on the floor with Kawhi is just a cluster waiting to happen.

    BUT... if he could become a legit 3-point threat? Pump-faking and then taking it to the hole, or dishing to Kawhi/LMA? That's a different story. But I don't remember many guys developing a 3P stroke that late in their careers.

  12. #37
    The St. Croix Boy duncan2k5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    5,962
    Ppl can't just look at the percentages with green...He stagnates the offense vs good teams because he is a one trick pony...They run him off the line and force him to dribble, which usually leads to disaster... let's not forget his performances against the elite playoff teams (who we need to beat)...Simmons has played better vs rockets and warriors the whole season and playoffs

  13. #38
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,068
    The exact same thing I say about D-League Green.

    He shot 33.2% from three last season and his slurpers thought LASIK surgery would fix his broken ass jumper. Then followed it up by shooting 33.3% from three this calendar year, and shot 34.2% from three in the playoffs. His "defense" got torched by every single player he guarded until Kawhi and Simmons took his assignment.

    Props to him for conning a team into paying him $10,000,000/yr though
    I agree with that. He's disappointed every post season after 2014. His game declined significantly after he signed his $$big deal.

  14. #39
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    Imagine starting Murray, Simmons, Green, and Kawhi. Defensively it would be pretty solid. I think that might be worth looking at especially since the league is going small ball anyway.

  15. #40
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,665
    If Green can start, so can Simmons...Green is so immensely overrated on here...I'm tired of watching him get blown by on defense, clank threes, and struggle to dribble and pass...Dude had an entry pass picked off for goodness sakes...Even if Simmons is our SG off the bench, I dont want Green starting...I think every team in the NBA chooses Simmons over Green based on this past season...Green is too easy to defend vs the good teams...
    Except any team that pays attention to metrics/advanced stats. WS/48 to Green by .141 (superior starter level) to .035 (deep bench crap). How about DRPM 1.71 to -2.03 . RPM 1.27 to -0.91. VORP 2.0 to 0.0 Even PER, which is hugely weighted towards inefficient offense, Danny 10.2 Jonathan 9.9.

    I will give you Simmons had a good 2 weeks in a high touch role that he only sees if we are in deep injury trouble. This may have been a hot streak for his jumper, we just don't know. I say see if we can work something by way of S&T if he wants a big contract...

  16. #41
    TB 2 TB Silver&Black's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    17,516
    I want Simmons to stop falling down every other time he drives to the basket. Let's work on that first. Then we'll talk about a starting role.

  17. #42
    The Stone Cutter Jdspur20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    1,160
    Even if you think Simmons is or can be better than Green, starting him is a terrible idea IMO..for Simmons to be effective, he needs the ball in his hands..he has looked horrible as a role player during his time as a Spur, it's not his role, he needs to be a high-usage type like a Lance Stephenson or Tyreke Evans..

    It's not a coincidence that his breakout games usually involve Kawhi, Parker or Manu not being on the court with him..his usage rate in the playoffs was 23.3%, there's no way he would ever approach that with Kawhi and Aldridge on the floor..

    Simmons' usage rate with Aldridge and Kawhi on the floor was 12%, this season..completely wastes his offensive ability..if you're going to pay him and commit, he needs to take over Manu's bench anchor role and allow him to run the offense..
    This

  18. #43
    wemby enjoyer 100%duncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    28,381
    The exact same thing I say about D-League Green.

    He shot 33.2% from three last season and his slurpers thought LASIK surgery would fix his broken ass jumper. Then followed it up by shooting 33.3% from three this calendar year, and shot 34.2% from three in the playoffs. His "defense" got torched by every single player he guarded until Kawhi and Simmons took his assignment.

    Props to him for conning a team into paying him $10,000,000/yr though
    But he was in 2013, 2014.

  19. #44
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    But he was in 2013, 2014.
    Danny has been flat out awful since getting paid. His transition D is the only portion of his game that's been any good and that usually comes at the hefty price of a Spurs turnover.

  20. #45
    wemby enjoyer 100%duncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    28,381
    Danny has been flat out awful since getting paid. His transition D is the only portion of his game that's been any good and that usually comes at the hefty price of a Spurs turnover.
    I know he's been bad but not flat out awful. Anyway my comment was in response to Danny being a starting SG on a championship team. He was for 3 years.

  21. #46
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    I know he's been bad but not flat out awful. Anyway my comment was in response to Danny being a starting SG on a championship team. He was for 3 years.
    Yeah that Green is never coming back. He'll be 30 with guaranteed money. It's only downhill from now.

    I just posted what was on my chest. Dudes acting like he's on a bargain contract. no. Might've been a bargain when he signed it (contract year Green>>>) but now he's playing like a 3M/yr scrub. Robbed Buford and co.

    The D-League player we've seen for 2-3 years now is not a starter on a championship team.

  22. #47
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    Does anyone remember off the top of your heads where Danny was drafted? He was #46. And Mills was #55. I've said it elsewhere, but some draft years have more than their share of second round gems. I have a feeling that this is going to be one of those. I'm a lot more concerned over who the Spurs draft this year, than who they sign and who they keep. I'd like to see them buy one of those for-cash second round picks that happen almost every year. If the Spurs pick well, and get a little lucky, this draft could go a long way toward making their future. A fresh pair of over-achievers, at second round rookie prices would be good for the gene pool.

    For the record, though - some guys age, and become bench players. Danny isn't one of those. When he's no longer good enough to start, he's done. If he wants another contract, he better pick it up. I don't know if he's got it in him, but that ought to be motivating enough.

  23. #48
    Veteran james evans's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    5,780
    I still prefer Green. He's a much better 3 point shooter and a better defender. He fits better with Kawhi too.

    Not sure how willing I am to have Simmons back, depends on how much he wants and how it affects the rest of the cap situation.
    green's 3 point shot is GONE and his defense has been complete all year too. Since Green got paid, he has declined every year and fans keep waiting for him to break out of a slump. IT'S NOT HAPPENING. he's done. The sooner people realize this, the better things will be

  24. #49
    My Girl's a Hooper keithington1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    413
    The fact we were up by 21 to the Warriors I would not trade Aldridge. If we could trade Danny green for 22 (Nets), 25 (Orlando) 28 (Lakers), 30 (Jazz), 34 (Kings). We could get 2 solid young players. This draft is loaded. Simmons gets the start.

  25. #50
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    Whatever perception here is Green will undoubtedly be named to an all D team. That said, like I posited in another thread, time to try to parlay him into a draft pick, hopefully in the first round.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •