Reply With Quote
LOL Trumpers are the feelings over facts group
the left is the side that always pushes for separation of church and state. so i dont see why that's so funnyYeah I’m sure the left will oppose sharia law here aka religion of peace
again, allowing muslims to move here =/= endorsing the tenets of islam and wanting them part of our government
its a ty strawman people keep going back to
LOL Trumpers are the feelings over facts group
LOL Trumpers are the feelings over facts group
Not really. Once the population reaches 16% Muslim it all turns to .
why is that the magic number?
Well it's only 2 away from 18 and 18 is when it all comes to an end.
LOL not a Trumper. Just like every other poster on the right here who doesn't like him yet constantly semen shields for him. Trump's entire campaign was all about the feels and provoking emotions. It sure wasn't about the facts since that piece of lies about everything large and small.
How a 1944 decision on Japanese internment affected the Supreme Court’s travel ban decision
Fred Korematsu, a 23-year-old American citizen, was ordered to go to one of those camps in 1942. He refused, pleading his case in the courts until the Supreme Court resolved the issue. In the 1944 case Korematsu v. United States, the court ruled 6-3 in favor of the government, determining that the president’s national security argument allowed the executive order to stand.
That decision was officially rejected by the Supreme Court on Tuesday as part of Trump v. Hawaii, the court’s upholding of President Trump’s ban on migration from certain mostly Muslim countries.
University of Michigan law professor Richard Primus wrote an article exploring precisely the overlap between Korematsu and the travel ban in May 2017.
When he revisited that article in April, he noted that
“the deepest lesson of Korematsu is one that ought to make us unsurprised if the Supreme Court upholds the entry ban orders”
— to wit, that
the court “is perfectly capable of signing off on morally evil executive branch policies
that are ostensibly (but not really) necessary for national security,
even when the legal arguments for the executive branch are weak.”
During the campaign,
Trump himself pointed to Japanese internment as a precedent for his proposed ban on Muslim migration to the United States.
Lawyers associated with his campaign, Primus said, pointed to Korematsu as a precedent defending the idea
Sotomayor’s dissent, though, argues that there are specific parallels.
“As here, the Government invoked an ill-defined national security threat to justify an exclusionary policy of sweeping proportion. . . .
As here, the exclusion order was rooted in dangerous stereotypes about, inter alia, a particular group’s supposed inability to assimilate and desire to harm the United States. . . .
As here, the Government was unwilling to reveal its own intelligence agencies’ views of the alleged security concerns to the very citizens it purported to protect. . . .
And as here, there was strong evidence that impermissible hostility and animus motivated the Government’s policy.”
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
