Would you be hopeful that he's excited to pay all that?
Would you be hopeful that he's excited to pay all that?
Not excited, no. Who gets excited about taxes?
Is the absence of outrage excitement?
If they did as much good as liberals like to pretend, I should think that many would be excited about paying taxes.
Non sequitur.
Thanks for playing.
Obviously, you don't know what a non sequitur is. This is precisely why people should stop pretending that the science of logic is to be rigorously applied to message boards.
If you say so.
I just asked a question (twice) that you can't answer without changing the subject. I'm surprised you didn't jump straight to the Clinton white flag like usual.
I was the first one to ask a question, which you answered with a question. I'd say you're the one who changed the subject.
There is no Clinton white flag either. If you're going to say someone is a racist while supporting the most racist person in the field, you're going to get called out. You didn't even wave a white flag, you just ran like a .![]()
Sooo, a player/team says they won't go to the Whitehouse because it's Trump. And so the President withdraws the offer. And now HE'S the one dividing the country over sports? Laughable. This crap all started with Kapernick and has made its way around the world of sports.
Wrong.
Nope. Your copied premise is false. The team hadn't voted and Curry was going to act according to that.
Get your facts straight.
Curry could not wait he above team
Your question was based on the false premise that one must be excited about paying taxes if they're not outraged by it.
The Fox article presents Curry's tax rate as an outrageous burden, yet it's telling that aside from quoting a tweet of his (where he basically says it's not a big deal) they don't care to get his statement on the matter. As they know, if they had gotten his opinion on his tax rate, they would have probably had to quote him saying he didn't mind, he's blessed, or whatever. Doesn't fit the narrative so well.
There you go again.There is no Clinton white flag either. If you're going to say someone is a racist while supporting the most racist person in the field, you're going to get called out. You didn't even wave a white flag, you just ran like a .![]()
![]()
WTF is the SCIENCE of logic? Logic is a practice we use which follows a set of reasonable rules.
Science USES logic ya dumb .
I wasn't arguing a premise, dude. I was asking a question for discovery. Again, you should stop trying to apply the rigors of logic; you are constantly misapplying them.
And you were complaining about FN not saying Curry's side when he left a tweet on this? And post the quote; at this point, I wonder if you aren't putting words into Curry's mouth....
Bro, don't try to pretend your L on Clinton is actually a W. That's just pathetic. You ran like a ; the record shows this.
You seriously need to go sit in a ing corner or something...
Logic is the science of rational thinking or reasoning. Logic is the science of rational thinking or reasoning. As such, it includes found a tion of the scientific method including the hypothetico-deductive a ccount of science.
http://www.renyi.hu/~nemeti/whatislogic.html
No its not.
Science is simply a way of observing, experimenting USING LOGIC in order to try and understand the world around us.
Logic is NOT a science. Logic is a way of thinking studied in Philosophy. But, but it's on the Internet. And it's flat out wrong. Science USES logic. Science USES certain types of reasoning to understand the world around us. Just like Math is not a science. It's the language of some types of science.
You and your reference suck. Seriously.
Last edited by pgardn; 09-23-2017 at 10:55 PM.
Okay, I'll go back and tell my university logic teacher that he was an idiot for spending all that time talking about how logic is a science....
Seriously, go find a ing corner and sit in it.
Oh No! Not your... Teacher!
Do that then.
And give him what I wrote.
If he's worth a he will understand what you don't.
You. Are flat out wrong.
The science of this, the science of that... Is there a science of philosophy ya frkn dork?
Of course because it'd be much easier if people took your stupid claims at face value.
If you want to be a bombastically wrong jackass, that's your deal. I don't need to go back and ask my professor if my interpretation of the many times he said, "logic is science" is wrong. It was a running theme throughout the curriculum, ffs. Did you even take a class in logic?
That's never been my position, JV Chump.
This is exactly what Plato wrote about. He thought that pure reasoning and logic could be obscured by the senses. Meaning merely observing and experimenting could ruin pure reason. Science uses OBSERVATION and EXPERIMENTATION to make sense of the world AROUND us. Logic is not a SCIENCE. Science USES logic to make reasonable statements about our surroundings. Now even including, what goes on inside our own heads (neurology and such).
If you had any background besides your stupid blustering you would know this.
You are just wrong. And I don't give a Fk what your JC curriculum said.
I'm not wrong, dude. You're making ass of yourself. Seriously, did you even take a class in logic? This is something that people learn on Day 1.
-- That would honestly be like saying physics is not science because it uses chemistry (science).Logic is not a SCIENCE. Science USES logic to make reasonable statements about our surroundings.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)