Reply With Quote
If that's the case it should be super easy to specify the crimes you're talking about. Only a moron would have trouble naming things that are so obvious to everyone else.
But seriously, who wastes their time like this?
Three weeks before the election, Silver appearing on national TV to say that Hillary had all but won the election. Can you point to anything in that video that is contrary to my recap?internet polls that got spammed by Trump s
If that's the case it should be super easy to specify the crimes you're talking about. Only a moron would have trouble naming things that are so obvious to everyone else.
But seriously, who wastes their time like this?
Why do Silver's slurpers always gloss over how wrong he was during the entire primary process? I remember Silver insisting at one point that Trump had a better chance of playing in the NBA Finals than winning the GOP nomination.
"Silver was always right about Trump, guys! He called it!"
Why would I want to itemize a litany of crimes for someone who is in denial? You've been around the block, dude. Why are you still in denial?
Yeesh that is pretty embarrassing for Silver tbh"Silver was always right about Trump, guys! He called it!"
"Silver was always right about Trump, guys! He called it!"
baseline bum
The fact that ducks is the only one I directly know who nailed Trump winning the primaries and general is pretty hilarious
You don't have to itemize anything, you just have to name one thing.
Lol moving the goal posts he was still right about your
You can't name any.
For what reason? To feed your psychosis?
Anyone paying attention must come to one of two conclusions:
1. Hillary is the figurehead of a criminal conglomerate.
2. Hillary knowingly associates with hardcore criminals to her great advantage.
In which camp do you fall?
deleting emails w/o a permit I think
Are you saying that the deleting of the e-mails was not criminal?
you can't name any crimes
"Silver (wrote) for months about how close the election..." Those are his "goalposts". Feel free to present the supporting evidence.
Pick your number, bro. I don't think you have the scrotum to promptly do it.
1. Hillary is the figurehead of a criminal conglomerate.
2. Hillary knowingly associates with hardcore criminals to her great advantage.
To establish yourself as anything more than an uninteresting poster.
Still failing.Anyone paying attention must come to one of two conclusions:
1. Hillary is the figurehead of a criminal conglomerate.
2. Hillary knowingly associates with hardcore criminals to her great advantage.
In which camp do you fall?
So, you don't think that at a minimum Hillary associates with hardcore criminals?
I don't think that was your claim. That's a pretty pathetic attempt at naming her obvious criminal history.
Which hardcore criminals?
Which crimes?
So, you don't think that at a minimum Hillary associates with hardcore criminals?
Which hardcore criminals?
What crimes?
Okay; but I'm not trying to sell a denier like you on my claim. We're nailing down your level of denial as to show you why it would be pointless for me to list the litany of Hillary's crimes. If you can't even concede that she associates with criminals, then you're that far gone.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
