Reply With Quote
so Trump is deep state now?
I take the side of peace fellas
Peace can only be achieved with a world balance. Last 20 years have proven this. US was hands down the king and wars were rampart
so Trump is deep state now?
Holy
thinking Trump makes the decisions of National Security
Dep State got him by the balls. He can work on social economic issues but hes been pulled from making any decisins that would hurt Neocon policies
lol Tillerson telling Trump when he is leaving
Plus Tillerson was ok with iran deal and Trump is in Zionist pocket. Im surprised Rex lasted this long tbqh
With Pompeo in, the Iran deal is certainly to be killed, proving to USA's allies that are party to the deal that "America First" means unreliable USA s enemies and friends indifferently.
Pootin will be thrilled that Manchurian Trash is screwing USA's NATO allies.
Trump dismisses Tillerson for crossing the only 'Red Line' that counts: Russia, Russia, Russia
He’s left the offices of the State Department empty and
done nothing about the dozens of open ambassadorships around the world.
He’s negotiated no deals.
He’s made no policy.
He’s accepted humiliating public tongue-lashings from Trump—
including having his own selection for deputy overridden.
None of that was enough to protect Tillerson
when he dared suggest that
not only was Russia behind a nerve agent attack in the UK,
but that
the United States would take action to protect their closest ally and NATO partner.
On board a plane bound for Africa,
Tillerson called
the attack “a really egregious act,”
said that the attack was clearly from Russia, and
promised that the United States would act to defend its ally.
And just like that, he was gone.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
Last edited by boutons_deux; 03-13-2018 at 02:43 PM.
Derp state
Rex Tillerson has been fired. Experts say he did damage that could last “a generation.”
Tillerson was “one of the worst secretaries of state” in modern history
https://www.vox.com/world/2018/3/13/...ate-department
same is true of the damage the Repug kakistocratic s of the oligarchy.
Pruitt, Zinke, Devos, Senate packing Fed appeals courts with ideological, incompetent assholes, terrible damage to America that will take years, decades to reverse, if ever.
America is ed and un able, and ed to enrich/empower/protect the oligarchy.
Lmao Trump about to appoint John Bolton
War with Iran is a lock if that happens. getting real
Is President Trump about to make this warmongering lunatic his national security adviser?
Reports that John Bolton met with President Trump in the White House on Tuesday to discuss the possibility of him succeeding H.R. McMaster as national security adviser should send a chill down the spines of every American — and indeed of every person on the planet.
a country with a less bellicose foreign policy establishment, Bolton would be considered a warmongering lunatic. But America's foreign policy establishment inclines toward reflexive militarism (on the grounds that American bombs, troops, and special operations forces are invariably a force for good in the world), and so Bolton comes off as merely somewhat more unhinged than his peers. But that shouldn't blind us to the enormous danger confronting us all if he were to ascend to such a powerful position in the Trump administration.
Bolton thinks that war — by which I mean everything from the launching of missiles to the deployment of ground forces to foreign theaters of battle — is the solution to every problem the United States confronts in the world. That is not an exaggeration. I challenge readers to find any statement Bolton has made against any American act of war at any time anywhere. And no, Bolton's harsh words for the Obama administration's plans for a limited air strike against Syria in retaliation for Bashar al-Assad's use of chemical weapons in the country's civil war doesn't count, since the criticism amounted to the argument that the bombing would be too limited in scope.
ong the way, he also tried to assimilate Cuba into the "axis of evil" by accusing the country (on the basis of intelligence that was later debunked) of developing biological weapons and distributing them to Libya and Syria. He later advocated the targeted assassination of Libya's Moammar Gadhafi and then backed the Obama administration's military intervention there (which of course didn't stop him from blasting the Libyan action after it had devolved into Iraq-like chaos as "too little, too late"). He thinks the U.S. should have invaded Syria and overthrown Assad shortly after the Iraq invasion of 2003, just as he's made clear over and over again that he thinks it would be a splendid idea for the U.S to bomb Iran — and perhaps even a good thing for Israel to launch a preemptive nuclear strike against the country.
And then there's North Korea, one of the biggest problems confronting the Trump administration and the world. It will surprise no one that Bolton favors a massive preemptive strike against the country — or that he waves away concerns about the potential for massive casualties and the possible negative consequences for America's strategic interests throughout the region. We would simply ask for China's help in bringing about a "controlled collapse of the North Korean regime." Sure the costs could be enormous. But for Bolton, the costs of avoiding war would clearly be greater.
This is what defines Bolton's foreign policy thinking: the conviction that war is always the best option.
Having a man who so consistently — one might almost say instinctually — favors military action serving as the national security adviser to the president would be dangerous in any White House. But in the Trump administration it could be catastrophic.
http://theweek.com/articles/759501/p...curity-adviser
Wapo: Trash "decided" to fire McMaster
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
