Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 59
  1. #26
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    they weren't on the table

  2. #27
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    We could've had 13 14 and Tobias
    eyup

  3. #28
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    but purdle....

  4. #29
    dump derozan Genovaswitness's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Post Count
    1,716
    Got no first round pick

    kept the Gasol and Mills contracts

    got no young prospect



    RV Drunkford fluffers working overtime to polish this turd lmfao. Our big 3 consists of Aldridge, Derozan, and Gay. The playoffs aren't ready for us!
    goddamn. prescient

  5. #30
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Getting Siakam was never a realistic option..can't even envision a scenario where Ujiri would have included him in this deal..

  6. #31
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Getting Siakam was never a realistic option..can't even envision a scenario where Ujiri would have included him in this deal..
    Kawhi shouldn't have been an option for Ujiri yet, here we are....

  7. #32
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    9,483
    Getting Siakam was never a realistic option..can't even envision a scenario where Ujiri would have included him in this deal..
    What if we had offered to let them keep DeRozan if they had given us Siakam instead?

    Obviously they wouldn’t do it now knowing what they know. But maybe they would’ve been willing to do it then.

  8. #33
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    9,483
    In hindsight, we should’ve made the deal OG, Siakam, Poeltl, plus a first round pick for Kawhi. Obviously the Raptors would never do that deal now knowing what they know. But they may have been willing to do it then—the prospect of teaming Kawhi with DeRozan and Lowry may have been too tantalizing to pass up.

  9. #34
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Kawhi shouldn't have been an option for Ujiri yet, here we are....
    Kawhi was a 1-year rental coming from a team that had no leverage against him..

  10. #35
    Veteran barakz21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    1,442
    Out of curiosity, as I never watched Raptors games, what’s the deal with wanting Siakam? Was it because of potential or flashes he shown last year? Or was he actually producing for them, as well as showing flashes?

  11. #36
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    What if we had offered to let them keep DeRozan if they had given us Siakam instead?

    Obviously they wouldn’t do it now knowing what they know. But maybe they would’ve been willing to do it then.
    They knew then what they know now. They didn't want DeRozan. He was a flat out salary dump. Toronto also couldn't trade Siakem straight up for Kawhi because Leonard made too much money.

  12. #37
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    What if we had offered to let them keep DeRozan if they had given us Siakam instead?

    Obviously they wouldn’t do it now knowing what they know. But maybe they would’ve been willing to do it then.
    Dumping DeRozan's deal was the biggest part of this trade for Masai..he was able to dump that contract, while acquiring a superstar for 1 year as a way to save face with the many fans and media that would kill him for trading DD(which did occur and looks really stupid in hindsight )..it was house money for him..

    Ujiri loves Siakam, can't imagine any way he would have given him up for a 1-year rental, knowing the Spurs didn't have any leverage after Kawhi sabotaged his trade value..

  13. #38
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Kawhi was a 1-year rental coming from a team that had no leverage against him..
    New Orleans has no leverage with Anthony Davis. Let's see what kind of return he gets.

  14. #39
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    New Orleans has no leverage with Anthony Davis. Let's see what kind of return he gets.
    New Orleans may not have played it the same way had the Kawhi situation not occurred just months earlier..

  15. #40
    Realistic Spurs Fan Amuseddaysleeper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    17,732
    Out of curiosity, as I never watched Raptors games, what’s the deal with wanting Siakam? Was it because of potential or flashes he shown last year? Or was he actually producing for them, as well as showing flashes?
    He’s getting the most improved player award. He’s better than anyone on the spurs roster right now

  16. #41
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479
    Siakam would have made the trade digestible.

  17. #42
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    He’s getting the most improved player award. He’s better than anyone on the spurs roster right now

  18. #43
    Veteran JeffDuncan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    3,045
    Out of curiosity, as I never watched Raptors games, what’s the deal with wanting Siakam? Was it because of potential or flashes he shown last year? Or was he actually producing for them, as well as showing flashes?
    Siakam was a bench player for the Raps last year. He played in 81 games but only started 5. He didn't look nearly as desirable a player as he looks now.

    Ppg last year, 7.3
    This year, 16.9.

    Free throw % last year, .621
    This year, .785.

    3pt % last year, .220
    This year, .369.

    Huge improvements.

  19. #44
    Veteran barakz21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    1,442
    He’s getting the most improved player award. He’s better than anyone on the spurs roster right now
    Yeah, no I got that. I was just curious, why people wanted him before the trade, potential + flashes or if he was actually producing for them last year. But man, would’ve been really nice had they gotten him in that deal.

  20. #45
    Veteran barakz21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    1,442
    Siakam was a bench player for the Raps last year. He played in 81 games but only started 5. He didn't look nearly as desirable a player as he looks now.

    Ppg last year, 7.3
    This year, 16.9.

    Free throw % last year, .621
    This year, .785.

    3pt % last year, .220
    This year, .369.

    Huge improvements.
    So potential then, got it. Boy, that trade would’ve been awesome had they gotten the same
    package plus Siakam. God, I can’t wait for this draft. As a spurfan, I can’t really root for the dubs. But since I’m a spurfan, I will, because Kawhi.

  21. #46
    Club Rookie of The Year DJR210's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    18,702
    Pop and RC should get nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for this generosity they've shown to the Toronto Raptors.. So selfless to gift them the best player in basketball for 3 role players

  22. #47
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    14,781
    New Orleans has no leverage with Anthony Davis. Let's see what kind of return he gets.
    they have more leverage than the Spurs had because AD is healthy while Kawhi was healthy but everybody thought he was hurt and there were big concerns about his health

    Siakam, OG and Poeltl for Kawhi doesn't work salary wise. I don't think Ujiri wanted to give up Siakam. I think he wanted to dumb DeRozan and the Spurs wanted to pair him up with Kawhi and Aldridge, but since Kawhi wanted out they traded him for DeMar. There were rumors that the Spurs were getting another star player before they decided to trade Leonard.

    Siakam or OG are the 2 players you would want to replace a wing with elite defense. Getting Poeltl instead was really disappointing.

    The problem with DeRozan is that if you split his 28 million on 2 elite role players, you'll probably get the same production with better defense and better spacing

  23. #48
    Veteran LkrFan's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    40,807


  24. #49
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    36,594
    Dumping DeRozan's deal was the biggest part of this trade for Masai..he was able to dump that contract, while acquiring a superstar for 1 year as a way to save face with the many fans and media that would kill him for trading DD(which did occur and looks really stupid in hindsight )..it was house money for him..

    Ujiri loves Siakam, can't imagine any way he would have given him up for a 1-year rental, knowing the Spurs didn't have any leverage after Kawhi sabotaged his trade value..
    Disagree.
    You have Kawhi.
    You wait for a better offer.
    But let's say dumping DD was the primary objective...
    So Spurs eat the worse, contract, trade the best player by far even if coming off injury... And best future asset they get is a middling pick?!

    How does that make anything better for this deal?!
    This has NOTHING TO DO WITH Lakers its simply a bad trade despite DD helping Spurs make playoffs... Plus now even Danny Green is knocking down shots and defending... Just indefensible

    But if this ends the Warriors run thank God...
    I like being the last team to three peat
    Warriors may come back but without KD they in legitimate trouble and now Iggy is hurt too

  25. #50
    Kori's nightmare SpurOutofTownFan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    4,381
    You know the spurs misdiagnosing his injury is talked about a lot among people and the media but what if the spurs really thought he wouldn’t ever be the same player again, imagine if his injury was really bad and would have affected him this season, the spurs would look like winners in the trade but unfortunately kawhi is back playing at an elite level
    The last year of the "injury" was all fake so he could get the out of there. That's the main problem in trust. He's just as healthy as he was for the entire last year he was out.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •