Right, it has nothing to do with a shutdown.
I'm not going to waste any more posts on a re ed piece of . I'll let someone else do the 5 page back and forth with you.
Smhlol derrrrp
I knew he would likely do the bit about shall receive compensation. Also, the 27th Amendment point has nothing to do with a shutdown.
Today's cuck
Right, it has nothing to do with a shutdown.
I'm not going to waste any more posts on a re ed piece of . I'll let someone else do the 5 page back and forth with you.
Smhlol derrrrp
Unhinged cuck![]()
Derrrrrp
Fabbs letting everyone know his choice of motels
You're like Bizarro Perry Mason.
You lose every case.
People who think Congress shouldn't get paid are ing blind, the whole reason it's there is so that the rich members can't hold checks for the poor members hostage, which they would certainly do,.
Tell me exactly how you think I lost, CF.
There's a stipulation in the Cons ution that the US Congress must be paid. Full stop.
This isn't even a controversy. Your idiosyncratic gloss is wrong.
its not uncommon for derp to have delusional interpretations of the cons ution. he was trying to argue that the president has unilateral authority to remove a SCOTUS justice
It's called "Animal Farm" by George Orwell.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)