For almost 20 years, the Spurs had the Big 3. Those teams had the highest overall winning percentage of any team in any major sport over that period of time. FA's knew that there was already a Big 3, and they weren't part of it. So, yeah, some of them probably opted to go somewhere they could be an alpha dog. That was Pop's decision, but not his "fault". If it's not broke, don't fix it.
Some of it is money. Once again, if you have a Big 3 like Tim, Tony, and Manu you know you have to pay them to keep them. And you have a salary cap. So do you make a big FA signing and chance not being able to keep a team together in the future? Not if you're smart. Also, the money a player can make off of endorsements in SA just can't compare to what they can make in a big market - ESPECIALLY a big name player like the ones the OP is talking about. Jason Kidd claimed that the deciding factor was that there wasn't a big market TV station for his wife to work for.
Are there some who don't want to come to a town without world-class ty bars? Sure. If that's how they would make their decision, there's a good chance that they didn't get asked by PATFO. Don't forget that SpursTalk thinks the Spurs should sign EVERY big name FA that comes available, but we mostly don't know which ones the Spurs seriously pursue.
Most mid-tier FA's know that Pop doesn't hand out a lot of minutes in the first year, and maybe some of them have avoided signing here because of it. We don't know for sure, but maybe. And there may be some lazy-assed players who don't want to be held accountable, like they know Pop will. Other than that, it's not Pop's "fault" if a FA doesn't sign here.
But I just love the people who don't live in SA lecturing about life is (or isn't) in SA.

Reply With Quote
