Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 129
  1. #26
    MannyIsGod
    Guest
    I wanted odom too. The drug situation is apparently too much to stomach.

    If he gets suspended again, they'll look smart. If he blows up and doesn't get suspended, well then , ****.

    We'll see.

  2. #27
    TwoHandJam
    Guest
    The Spurs are obviously not interested in Odom. It also makes no sense to overpay for the "chance" of getting a RFA in Odom who we're not even sure has his head on straight and has been injury prone.

  3. #28
    Ghost Writer
    Guest
    Oh yeah, TwoHand. Horry at $5,000,000 is a much better scenario.






  4. #29
    Cassius Clay
    Guest
    Ghost, you are engaging in some of the most pointless ing imaginable.

  5. #30
    Aggie Hoopsfan
    Guest
    Come on Ghost, Odom will be a Clipper. They're working on extending his contract for 5 years. Read the news man.

    It's time to start filling out our roster. That offer to Horry is 100K above what any of the teams (like Dallas) could pay him.


    AHF

  6. #31
    Cassius Clay
    Guest
    Odom is one infraction away from either a season long or lifetime ban.

  7. #32
    Ghost Writer
    Guest


    A week ago you two jabronis were all over Odom.

    Sorry I am not thrilled about a Nesterovic/Horry summer.

    We're resorting to filling out the bench with overpriced players just because we have money to burn and no one good wants to sign with us... or we're too afraid to go out and sign them.

    Whoopty-friggin' do.


  8. #33
    scott
    Guest
    The Rasho/Horry summer shouldn't be viewed as that. It still leaves us with $6-7 mil in cap room to add talent via a trade. Have some faith- the summer ain't over yet.

  9. #34
    Ghost Writer
    Guest
    I am counting on that trade, scott. I hope Horry for $5 million doesn't hamper that, that's all.



  10. #35
    KoriEllis
    Guest
    I was told yesterday by a Spurs source that this deal was dead and that the Spurs were starting to offer contracts to other FA's (which is now evidenced by the Horry article).

    I will have him double-check today about this trade to make sure. My assumption at this point is that this is just hopeful thinking on the part of the Knicks, or a rumor that just won't die.

    If I find out otherwise, I'll let you know.

  11. #36
    T Park Num 9
    Guest
    TO ME!

    It seems the deal is dead, they wouldnt be trying to sign Robert Horry and trade for a 13 million dollar Spree.


    Horry Pike and others seem to be coming.....

  12. #37
    Ghost Writer
    Guest
    Sprewell > Rose > Jack > Piatkowski > Horry


    Next.



  13. #38
    scott
    Guest
    Rose + Jack + Piatkowski/Horry + $7 Cap space > Spreewell.

    Next.

  14. #39
    T Park Num 9
    Guest
    agree 100% Scott....

  15. #40
    Ghost Writer
    Guest
    And you two obviously don't understand that it wouldn't take all of that to get Spree.

    Next.


  16. #41
    T Park Num 9
    Guest
    It wouldnt???


    I see......

    Guess they ins uted a limitless cap number then.

  17. #42
    scott
    Guest
    The deal is Rose to Philly and Spree to us.

    Jack is the odd man out on the minutes as Pop sticks with his old reliable, Bruce Bowen.

    We can no longer afford Piatkowski or Horry, because we have no cap space.

  18. #43
    Ghost Writer
    Guest
    Pop didn't stick with ol' reliable when it mattered most in the playoffs.

    He went with Jackson.

    The Spurs could still afford Horry if we traded Rose to get Sprewell, champ.

    Piatkowski would not be needed with Sprewell, Manu and Jack on the squad.

    You were saying?


    Question.


  19. #44
    KoriEllis
    Guest
    If the Spurs are offering $5M to Horry, then they only have around $7M to make the Spree deal. That means they'd have to get rid of both Rose AND Bowen's contracts to have room for Spree. I don't see them considering that.

    As a sidenote to Ghost: your boy Jack's agent is being a jerk, but the Spurs are working hard on his deal.

  20. #45
    Ghost Writer
    Guest
    $7 million and Rose's contract isn't enough for Sprewell?

    Even more reason not to bring in Horry for $5 million.



  21. #46
    scott
    Guest
    Pop didn't stick with ol' reliable when it mattered most in the playoffs.

    He went with Jackson.

    The Spurs could still afford Horry if we traded Rose to get Sprewell, champ.

    Piatkowski would not be needed with Sprewell, Manu and Jack on the squad.

    You were saying?
    In your imaginary world, Pop would suddenly show Bowen the door, replacing him with Jackson in the starting lineup.

    In the real world, Jackson is gone or benched if we bring in Spreewell. You can choose to live in your world, or reality. But don't whine like a baby when your fantasies don't come true.

    As Kori corrected you, the Spurs would have to get rid of of Rose AND Bowen to get both Spree and Horry.

    You are right the Spurs would not need Piatkowski with Spree, Manu, and Jack on the team... expect Jack wouldn't be a critical player on the team. That leaves us with the initial equation.

    Rose + Jack + Horry + $7Mil Caproom > Spree.

    You were saying?

  22. #47
    KoriEllis
    Guest
    No Rose's contract isn't enough.

    $7M (room) + $~5M (Malik) < $13.5M (needed for Spree)

  23. #48
    ChumpDumper
    Guest
    This Spree trade ain't happening because neither the Knicks or Sixers need Rose or Bowen and the Spurs don't want to give up Manu--and at least one of those guys would have to go out in any trade for Spree.

    Pretty simple.

  24. #49
    tlongII
    Guest
    Why would the Spurs want Spree anyway? Dude's a freaking cancer. Maybe the Blazers should sign him?

  25. #50
    ShoogarBear
    Guest
    The thing that really makes the most sense is this:

    S&T Speedy plus draft pick + ? other throwin for Spree.

    -Knicks need point guard
    -Speedy goes home, and wasn't going to sign with Spurs anyway

    No third team needed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •