Reply With Quote
So then why the are you crying?
Finley > Brown
Van X and Big Dog cancel each other out. Although Van X will see more minutes than Big Dog would have.
Evans signed for at most the LLE, which the Spurs did not use in the offseason and, um, have yet to use.
So then why the are you crying?
Finley > Brown
Van X and Big Dog cancel each other out. Although Van X will see more minutes than Big Dog would have.
They didn't sign Van X with the MLE? I believe they did.
regardless why not carry two more minimum contracts on the chance they develop into something. We could have kept Ford and maybe someone else and given them a chance to develop every day in practice.
Because developing someone isn't a necessity at the moment, its a want by you guys.
And so what if the Spurs are trying to be financially tight with how they run the team. It hasn't affected the Spurs negatively in the Holt era.
, Holt went out and gave Tony a huge deal right after giving a good sized deal to Manu.
Problem is, they could've had Evans as well as Finley and NVE.
link
Swingman Maurice Evans, a restricted free agent from the Sacramento Kings, on Wednesday signed a multiyear offer sheet with the Pistons. It is believed to be for $1.5 million a year.
Now wtf would the Spurs want to add to their collection of 6'4" SGs? Damn is there anybody you don't want the Spurs to sign?
Yeah, developing a talented young player isn't a good idea. Learn that from Oprah too?
Getting "financially tight" when your team has the opportunity to win a couple more championships doesn't seem like a good idea. It's not like signing any of these guys for IR would've broken the bank.
1. It took Pop and Duncan jumping up and down to get him that deal.
2. Developing talent is a nescessity, you want to become a dynasty or not?
We can't play Finley, Barry, Bowen, Horry and VanX until there 50.
Pop had to chastise Holt into extending Parker. Pop even went to the media with it. That's unheard of.
I'm sorry which 6'4 SGs??
LOL, the Oprah jokes are very 2001. If I watched Oprah, I might feel offended.
Is developing young talent bad? No, that's not what I said poser.
I said its not a need. It's a need for a ty team like the Clippers or Lakers or Magic.
The ing Spurs locked up their main core until 2010, and you still piss and moan.Getting "financially tight" when your team has the opportunity to win a couple more championships doesn't seem like a good idea. It's not like signing any of these guys for IR would've broken the bank.
Developing a bunch of young talent is a need now?
Maybe in two seasons, but not now.
Yeah, he signed their offer for $1.5 mil, the LLE or less.
Evans is 6'5" and 220.
The Spurs know what the they're doing, they needed a better backup point guard. They got it.
They needed instant offense, they got it.
They've won three les in 7 years doing what they do which is not listen to guys on an internet fan message board.
It's an opportunity. Why wait when you need to and you might not be able to find as good of talent?
34, 34, & 32. That's the ages of 3 members of their swingman rotation.Maybe in two seasons, but not now.
You're right. The basketball people in the organization know what they are doing. Why limit them?
Funny. One could say that about SA development...They've won three les in 7 years doing what they do which is not listen to guys on an internet fan message board.
I forgot, 34 and 32 year olds can't play basketball.
Jesus christ, Bowen is what, 34?
Ferry and Kerr were how old? What about Sean and Mario?
Give me a break on this age issue.
...and Barry turns 35 next month.
How long did Ferry, Kerr, Elie and Elliott last? Remember how easy it was to find a replacement for Elliott?Ferry and Kerr were how old? What about Sean and Mario?
Give me a break on this age issue.
Limit them from what? Making more jeserys for players who won't play? Limit them from not carrying enough players for your liking?
I don't see the correlation. But whatever jabs to can try and get at me.Funny. One could say that about SA development...
And in better shape than most young players you have a hard on for.
Long enough to win rings.How long did Ferry, Kerr, Elie and Elliott last?
Um, welcome to the subject. Pop and RC wanted Brown and/or Evans. Holt said no.
It's fairly obvious. But recognizing that isn't your strong suit.I don't see the correlation. But whatever jabs to can try and get at me.
Because they didn't want to pay $4.5 million for an IR player.Why'd the Spurs not sign Maurice Evans again?
Not really.
Then they were gone. Remember the '01 postseason?Long enough to win rings.
More like $1.5 mil per. Anyways, they've waived more than $4.5 mil before.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
