Spacey posts creepy video, his accuser dies from apparent suicide the next day

[Spurtacular]

So the conspiracy theory now is that Spacey is just announcing all the murders he is committing because his career is going gangbusters right now.

I don't think gangbusters means what you think it means, tbh.

[Reck]

Spaceys been taken to court.
Those darn witnesses keep dying.
The other one who withdrew the charges -perhaps Spacey was legally not guilty.

Didn’t that guy dropped the lawsuit? He settled.

He got what he wanted.

[DAF86]

Three young acussers of the same felony dying the same year is perfectly normal guys. Just the idea of considering investigating these deaths is some conspiracy lunacy . Coincidences exist, you know? What's next, you are also going to say you believe in science fiction tales like the mafia and real life paid hitmen? That's some fictional Hollywood . Don't be so delusional.

Also, the video Spacey made playing around with the words "dead" and "kill" is just further proof that he didn't do . I mean, no guilty person would around like that. Just like no accused person would around with that after two of his accussers just died of mysterious ways. And if a third one dies hours after the release of said video, well, that's just even more proof of his innocence, tbh.

[DAF86]

ing re s.

The worst part is they believe they are the smart ones.

[Xevious]

If nothing else, Spacey has accepted his role in life as a tv show villain. I mean, what other human being would think that video was a good idea, especially after two of his accusers had died within the year?

[ChumpDumper]

I don't think gangbusters means what you think it means, tbh.

I don't think you know what sarcasm means.

What do you think I mean here, derp?

Step up.

[ChumpDumper]

ing re s.

The worst part is they believe they are the smart ones.

"Young accusers"?

Behn was 47, Culkin was 59 and no one knows how old the masseur was because he's apparently still afraid he'll be murdered.

Are you the smart one or are you 90 years old?

[DAF86]

"Young accusers"?

Behn was 47, Culkin was 59 and no one knows how old the masseur was because he's apparently still afraid he'll be murdered.

Are you the smart one or are you 90 years old?

Young as in "none of them is even close of dying of old age".

[ChumpDumper]

Young as in "none of them is even close of dying of old age".

I'll preface this by saying I have no reason to doubt Spacey molested several victims. That said, it has been reported the life expectancy of the mentally ill is 10-20 years shorter than that of those who are not-- so that takes care of Culkin and Behn, whose illnesses have been do ented by the courts and by himself, respectively.

http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2014-05-23-...-heavy-smoking

Next, neither Culkin nor Behn could put Spacey in any jeopardy on his/her own. I can't say what the statute of limitations is in Norway, but extraditing Spacey to Norway for a ball grab stretches credulity. Culkin had no standing to do anything legally herself, and whatever contribution she could make to someone else's case would be slightly undermined by this:

Between 2009 and 2011, federal investigators said Culkin mailed threats to several people and their workplaces in the United States and abroad. One of her hoax bomb threats caused police in a foreign city, near one of the biggest train stations in the country, to evacuate a building and close off a neighborhood. Another, an envelope that contained a white powder that looked similar to anthrax, caused people nearby to be quarantined and fear for their health.

Prosecutors also said she was obsessed with actor Kevin Spacey, saying she threatened to kill the actor. She also sent bomb threats to two of his workplaces and sent threats to his coworkers and associates.

Culkin pleaded guilty in federal court to sending threats to the mail and over the internet, sending threats and false information regarding explosives and sending threats about biological agents. She was sentenced in 2014 to 51 months in prison, three years of probation and ordered to pay more than $125,000 in res ution.

https://www.patriotledger.com/news/2...-death-threats

And seriously, do smart people really think this is a likely assassination?

Linda Culkin, who was convicted in 2013 of making bomb, anthrax and other death threats, was struck around 7:30 p.m. at Granite Street and Burgin Parkway.

Police Sgt. Karyn Barkas said Culkin was crossing while the traffic light was green. She said the driver tried to avoid her and hit another vehicle head-on.

Both drivers remained at the scene and Culkin was taken to Boston Medical Center, where she died Wednesday. Neither driver had been charged as of Friday afternoon....

....Pedestrian accidents have long plagued Quincy. A Patriot Ledger analysis of state traffic data from 2002 through 2014 found that on average a pedestrian is hit by a car in Quincy every five days, with one or two killed in a typical year. In those years, there were 897 Quincy crashes involving pedestrians, including 17 that resulted in a death.

Someone explain how a hitman gets the timing just right to be in a car approaching Culkin just as she decides to jaywalk across a main traffic artery at 7:30PM in an accident-plagued Boston suburb-- and how the hitman stayed to identify himself and cooperate fully with the police at the scene.

Surely the smart people can tell me all about that.

That leaves John Doe. Well, I'll leave it to the smart people to tell me his real iden y. For some reason, he's still in hiding.

[DAF86]

I'll preface this by saying I have no reason to doubt Spacey molested several victims. That said, it has been reported the life expectancy of the mentally ill is 10-20 years shorter than that of those who are not-- so that takes care of Culkin and Behn, whose illnesses have been do ented by the courts and by himself, respectively.

http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2014-05-23-...-heavy-smoking

Next, neither Culkin nor Behn could put Spacey in any jeopardy on their own. I can't say what the statute of limitations is in Norway, but extraditing Spacey to Norway for a ball grab stretches credulity. Culkin had no standing to do anything legally herself, and whatever contribution she could make to someone else's case would be slightly undermined by this:



https://www.patriotledger.com/news/2...-death-threats

And seriously, do smart people really think this is a likely assassination?



Someone explain how a hitman gets the timing just right to be in a car approaching Culkin just as she decides to jaywalk across a main traffic artery at 7:30PM in an accident-plagued Boston suburb-- and how the hitman stayed to identify himself and cooperate fully with the police at the scene.

Surely the smart people can tell me all about that.

That leaves John Doe. Well, I'll leave it to the smart people to tell me his real iden y. For some reason, he's still in hiding.

Smart people don't say it's a likely anything. They don't jump to conclusions like some of you are so quick to do here just to pull the "hahaha crazy conspiracy s, you are so dumb" card.

If a potential accuser or witness dies out of the blue, it's already worth of skepticism and investigation. No matter how accidental the incident may look. If another one, tied to the same case, dies, then it's even more fuel to the fire. If three people, related to the same case, die in a span of months, then it's completely re ed to just shrug the deaths off as coincidences without even considering the possibility of the deaths being related.

Also, you are completely ignoring the Spacey video. The "non-conspiracists" are quick to point out that no guilty person would ever post a video like that but you fail to recognise that even if he, indeed, has no involvement on the deaths of those people, no accused person would ever post a video like that after two of his accusers misteriously died, tbh. So, no matter what, that video is breaking common sense one way or another, so trying to apply it for any of these cases is not a good argument.

[ChumpDumper]

Smart people don't say it's a likely anything. They don't jump to conclusions like some of you are so quick to do here just to pull the "hahaha crazy conspiracy s, you are so dumb".

If a potential accuser or witness dies out of the blue, it's already worth of skepticism and investigation. No matter how accidental the incident may look. If another one, tied to the same case, dies, then it's even more fuel to the fire. If three people, related to the same case, die in a span of months, then it's completely re ed to just shrug the deaths off as coincidences without even considering the fact of the deaths being related.

Also, you are completely ignoring the Spacey video. The "non-conspiracists" are quick to point out that no guilty person would ever post a video like that but you fail to recognise that even if he, indeed, has no involvement on the deaths of those people, no accused person would ever post a video like that after two of his accusers misteriously died, tbh. So, no matter what, that video is breaking common sense one way or another, so trying to apply it in any case is not a good argument.

The two deaths aren't mysterious. The masseur's death is only mysterious because the family still won't reveal his name.

Kevin Spacey is a narcissistic asshole who did molest people but had no real reason to murder any of his accusers. He just wasn't facing enough trouble to risk it.

That's all.

The smart people have no plausible alternative narrative.

You have no plausible alternative narrative.

I stand by my stated theory after actually looking up. You have no theory and won't go any further than innuendo.

smart people

[ChumpDumper]

And these people were not connected to the same case. There was only one case, unless you count Culkin's multiple federal convictions as another case. Culkin and Behn had nothing at all to do with John Doe.

Seriously tho, walk me through a plausible conspiracy theory were Spacey has all these people murdered and his reasoning for it.

Show me how the smart people do it.

[DAF86]

The two deaths aren't mysterious. The masseur's death is only mysterious because the family still won't reveal his name.

Kevin Spacey is a narcissistic asshole who did molest people but had no real reason to murder any of his accusers. He just wasn't facing enough trouble to risk it.

That's all.

The smart people have no plausible alternative narrative.

You have no plausible alternative narrative.

I stand by my stated theory after actually looking up. You have no theory and won't go any further than innuendo.

smart people

Answer these questions for me, please:

-Is it normal for three accusers and/or witnessess of the same case (or who accused the same guy) to die in the same year?
-Is it normal for an accused person to do the video Spacey did after two of his accusers had already died?
-Is it normal for a third accuser to die hours after the release of said video?
-Haven't you ever heard of powerful people getting away with crimes of all kind, even murders?
-No "witness" has ever given false testimony about an "accident"?

[ChumpDumper]

Answer these questions for me, please:

-Is it normal for three accusers and/or witnessess of the same case (or who accused the same guy) to die in the same year?

Not the same case. Quit trying to Pepe/Silvie this without any proof.

-Is it normal for an accused person to do the video Spacey did after two of his accusers had already died?

Kevin Spacey is not a normal man. He's a narcissistic asshole who misses the spotlight.

-Is it normal for a third accuser to die hours after the release of said video?

No. But mental illness and suicide are not normal things in the first place.

-Haven't you ever heard of powerful people getting away with crimes of all kind, even murders?

Sure. And? It's up to you to say what you think really happened if you're going to post anything more than innuendo. Are you going to do that?

-No "witness" has ever given false testimony about an "accident"?

Uh, it's not a witness -- IT WAS THE ACTUAL DRIVER OF THE CAR THAT HIT HER AND THEN ANOTHER CAR IN AN ATTEMPT TO NOT HIT HER.

You didn't even read what I posted.

you're a really smart person ignoring actual reported facts

Now, let me know that narrative of yours were Spacey has all these people murdered, explaining how and why.

[DAF86]

Not the same case.

Why did you ignore the "or who accused the same guy" part?

Kevin Spacey is not a normal man.

Well, "not normal people" have more chances of getting guys killed than "normal people", tbh.

Uh, it's not a witness -- IT WAS THE ACTUAL DRIVER OF THE CAR THAT HIT HER.

You didn't even read what I posted.

Well, even more reason to not give precise details.

Sure. And? It's up to you to say what you think really happened if you're going to post anything more than innuendo. Are you going to do that?


you're a really smart person ignoring everything actual facts

Now, let me know that narrative of yours were Spacey has all these people murdered, explaining how and why.

You don't get it. I'm not taking any side of the "accidents vs killings" argument. I'm not interested on that. I'm interested on highlighting the re ness of the people that won't even consider the possibility of these deaths not being accidental just because " conzzzpirazzy theoriezzzz ". The worst part is that you act like the re ed ones are those that have the mind opened enough to not dismiss any possibility beforehand.

[ChumpDumper]

Why did you ignore the "or who accused the same guy" part?

Because you led with "the same case" bull . Why include bull ?

Well, "not normal people" have more chances of getting guys killed than "normal people", tbh.

How are you saying he killed them?

Well, even more reason to not give precise details.

What details are you looking for since you didn't even read the facts I posted?

You don't get it. I'm not taking any side of the "accidents vs killings" argument. I'm not interested on that. I'm interested on highlighting the re ness of the people that won't even consider the possibility of these deaths not being accidental just because " conzzzpirazzy theoriezzzz ". The worst part is that you act like the re ed ones are those that have the mind opened enough to not dismiss any possibility beforehand.

I think you and others won't do anything more than make your own conclusions without even trying to look up anything more than someone else's innuendo. The default position of thinking it's conspiracy bull is the proper one here unless someone can convince otherwise. It's stupid on its face.

Do you think Spacey had these people killed?

Yes or no.

Take a side.

[Spurtacular]

I don't think you know what sarcasm means.

What do you think I mean here, derp?

Step up.

I don't think you made a coherent argument either way. You were too busy sperm shielding to be bothered.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't think you made a coherent argument either way

Well, you're pretty stupid, so I can see how you'd miss it.

I don't think Spacey had anyone killed. It's a stupid idea. People who believe Spacey had these people killed are stupid.

Do you think Spacey had these people killed?

Yes or no.

[DAF86]

Because you led with "the same case" bull . Why include bull ?

How are you saying he killed them?

What details are you looking for since you didn't even read the facts I posted?

I think you and others won't do anything more than make your own conclusions without even trying to look up anything more than someone else's innuendo. The default position of thinking it's conspiracy bull is the proper on here. It's stupid on its face.

Do you think Spacey had these people killed?

Yes or no.

Take a side.

Why do I have to take a side when my entire point is that entirely dismissing one of the possibilities is re ed and close-minded?

[ChumpDumper]

Why do I have to take a side when my entire point is that entirely dismissing one of the possibilities is re ed and close-minded?

Nah, it's the right thing to do. Conspiracy theories like this are just stupid.

What more do you need to know for you to actually have a take here?

[DAF86]

Nah, it's the right thing to do. Conspiracy theories like this are just stupid.

What more do you need to know for you to actually have a take here?

Ok, think what you want, just like you give me no choice but to think that you are a close-minded re on this matter, tbh.

[Spurtacular]

Well, you're pretty stupid, so I can see how you'd miss it.

I don't think Spacey had anyone killed. It's a stupid idea. People who believe Spacey had these people killed are stupid.

Do you think Spacey had these people killed?

Yes or no.

Maybe if you say stupid one more time then your argument will be so much more powerful, Blake Zero.

[Spurtacular]

Ok, think what you want, just like you give me no choice but to think that you are a close-minded re on this matter, tbh.

Chump's here to sperm shield for the system players. It's what he does.

[Reck]

"Young accusers"?

Behn was 47, Culkin was 59 and no one knows how old the masseur was because he's apparently still afraid he'll be murdered.

Are you the smart one or are you 90 years old?

DAF86 is just triggered he got called out on his out-there conspiracies. We all pretty much agree Spacey is a sex deviant monster but that shouldn’t make you unreasonable and start making TSA level posts.

[ChumpDumper]

Ok, think what you want, just like you give me no choice but to think that you are a close-minded re on this matter, tbh.

What more do you need to know for you to actually have a take here?

Or are you just content to go with the innuendo?

Looks like the latter.