Pop's system yielded the greatest consistency seen in any sport. Sure the peaks weren't as high, but the lows haven't been as low as franchises that have peaked higher. The baseline of 5 chips, and 50+ wins, is ridiculous in a league where dynasties have only lasted 3-4 years continuously since the 90s.
No. The Spurs helped those guys develop, but the benefit is that they were able to scout those guys well and get them into their club. All of those guys would have had NBA careers without the Spurs. That doesn't take credit from SA. It just clarifies what they get credit for. They were able to find the gold in the pile of crap earlier than a lot of teams. They didn't take crap and turn it into gold, and a lot of people seem to think they did.
The Spurs system wall about the good to great shot. This idea does not exist with the current team.
I mean obviously the Spurs have a system. Every team does. It's just that the league has caught up to it and copied it all together. I mean Steve Kerr literally studied Pop and asked him questions about his system to use for the Golden St Warriors. But as we've seen, you need players to play. I think the narrative that Pop can drag a team of scrubs to the playoffs by himself is what has been proven. Not that he doesn't have a system
tim tony manu kawhi
no 50 since whi left
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
