NO had/has superstars to get the big time money from the media and endorsements while Sacramento has arguably the best fanbase in the NBA. Orlando had a combination of both as well as being a top vacation destination for families.
I haven't heard anything negative regarding the financial state of the Spurs to be honest.
NO had/has superstars to get the big time money from the media and endorsements while Sacramento has arguably the best fanbase in the NBA. Orlando had a combination of both as well as being a top vacation destination for families.
They had a Freeman Coliseum agreement for the Stars to renovate that stadium, they still moved.
Depending on who bought the team I could see a buyout happening. , NBA might step in if it could get the team to Seattle.
Neither is Jerry.
NO isn't exactly a good example. It's only 10 years since the league had to step in and buy that team.
Sacramento is only valued at something barely over $1B and Orlando $1.3B. The Spurs are worth $300M - $400M more due to an uncanny period of success due mostly to two players. Peter Holt had a fun time getting to own a team. Forget about Pop and/or RC for a minute and consider Peter Holt and the Holt family.This would be a really good time to cash out.
What I said wasn't about the viability of small market teams. That's a whole different discussion. It was about creating a perception to smooth the PR blowback that would come with moving a storied franchise like the Spurs.
I'm not saying it's happening. Just giving some reasons why it could happen.
Probably the last beer he had, and the last time he dealt with Jimmy. Not sure whether he drinks scotch or bourbon, but I bet it ain't beer.
The Spurs can be as good as Utah or Portland. Stop playing the small market card. It's not the case that we can expect to attract stars, but that's not a sign they can't be profitable and well run. And stop mentioning Austin. They absolutely made MLS pick the fourth requested spot and there is no cheap land in Travis. They won't bend over for the NBA either. Austin also isn't black/cool either.
You know what? Forget the buying price. It doesn't matter. In 2009 the team was valued at $400M, and today it's valued over $1.6B. The other is a complete red herring.
I would say 3.2 players, with Number Two being the .2.
I like the logic in that theory. I'd like to believe Pop's ridiculous coaching decisions, rotations and roster depletion are due to some ingenious plan, rather than just a stubborn old man losing touch late in his career.
conspiracy theories
Spurs MIGHT miss the POs for the first time in basically a quarter century because our youth sucks and our vets suck and our only good players are old, but have been the only players to step up.
"THE SPURS ARE MOVING!"
"LET'S TANK FOR A 9-16 PICK IN A TY DRAFT"
"THEY WON'T GIVE OUR INCONSISTENT YOUTH CONSISTENT MINUTES! IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE!"
"THAT'S IT BOYS, I'M DONE. I AM ING DONE!"...goes and post 3 minutes later and post rate increases, somehow.
"Gutless worms" is the "fanbase" here. We're not going to win the le. 31 teams wont either. But setting a record that will be unbreakable is something sweet.
But hey, let's "blow it up" because the armchair GMs think a mid-pick in a draft is going to stem some long rebuild. Adding more fodder to the roster will solve so many issues.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)