Reply With Quote
Aside from the potential for fallibility, what's wrong with the death penalty?
the frankly paternalistic war against bodily autonomy for women in medical decisions continues apace.
equality for women is threatened in beaucoup GOP states.
https://cnsmaryland.org/2021/04/21/a...-legislatures/
Aside from the potential for fallibility, what's wrong with the death penalty?
The "right" to kill.
Yes the innocent "baby".
But then once you are _____ old we can kill you because you are no longer a human life. Or you forfeit your human life. That is so audaciously hypocritical... its worse that he is honest. And he is not honest, he just flat out does not see it. I dont give points for blind contradiction.
The same thing that you think is wrong with abortion you stupid piece of .
No fallibility needed dumb fck.
Use your words, Cuck Garden.
What's wrong with the death penalty?
Whats wrong with abortion, just say it.
And then you will get your answer dumb ass.
Other than the whole hypocrisy of "life is precious" but not really if you're a sinner and the whole other hypocrisy of hiding behind religion but forgetting that jesus taught about compassion and forgiveness and enduring evil?
Outside of all that, nothing wrong with capital punishment.
You don't want to say. Your opinion must not be important.
This is clearly a standard buzzword at this point.
so go ahead derp, NoNo spelled it out for you.
And throw in Original Sin for the fetus.
Your thoughts?
Well, you don't believe in either; so, you must be for capital punishment.
It is a word that stabs you directly in your brain. Its perfect.
You call it a buzzword because you are a hypocrite.
It's never hurt me at all. It's a barely specious argument that blue anons have been taught to rely upon.
You dont believe a human life is precious.
Thats all I can gather from your inability to explain yourself.
blue anon... "oh, a buzzword..."
You are a total mess.
So you got nothing, ok
Because I want to dipose the world of murderers?
Not at all; I said you clearly believe in capital punishment based on what you put forth.
No need to argue about it.
For what it's worth, I'm open to the idea of not having it based on humanitarian grounds.
But this BS about mixing it up with abortion doesn't move the needle. It's desperate.
So a murderer is NOT a human life?Because I want to dipose the world of murderers?
This brings out another issue with religion. Because it's the creation of humans, and spread and interpreted by humans, it really is and means anything you want it to be or mean.
And thus you have this problem where the same people that used to burn 'witches' at the stake are the same people talking about the sanc y of life.
It can always be argued that people were wrong then, and know better now, but can you make that claim? It wasn't god that illuminated people into realizing that what they were doing was wrong.
It was education, science, societal evolution, etc, which apparently still need to take a back seat to the transparent dummy in the sky.
By order of the state a person forfeits his life upon taking the life of someone else.
It's always been this way in our nation's history. George Washington put traitors to death.
He didn't cry about how these kinds of cowards should live.
Also, dovetailing onto fallibility, something derp brought up, that's not minor. It's pretty huge. Especially when there's really no reason why you couldn't keep these people locked up for life (other than the administrative cost).
Overall, it's less of an issue now, because we're not burning up heretics and witches, but on the other hand, we keep developing science like DNA tests, which have gotten quite a few wrongly imprisoned people (some on deathrow) free.
So any man who kills in battle is no longer considered a human life?
Where's that in the US Cons ution?
Also, how you reconcile that with your religious teachings? (this is a trick question)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
