Reply With QuoteMarcus led the movement for Kidd over Brand/O'Neal in the historic Kidd to SA? thread over at Dusty's Forum.
Now he's trying to say he was for the big man replacement all along.
Dope.
I don't buy that for a second, Ghost.
Marcus led the movement for Kidd over Brand/O'Neal in the historic Kidd to SA? thread over at Dusty's Forum.
Now he's trying to say he was for the big man replacement all along.
Dope.
Kidd made sense ... until Parker blew up and started showing signs of being a future all-star.
Now with Robinson gone and O'Neal and Brand on the market, you have to go at them first.
Despite what you might hear, the Spurs are doing that. Kidd is option #3.
Don't believe the other bs.
Well Ghost, if you can tell me a time you threw away $3 million, you can convince me Kidd has nothing to gain from a sign and trade.
Exactly. No wonder timvp is a banned word with real sources like that.Despite what you might hear, the Spurs are doing that. Kidd is option #3.
timvp, we knew we'd have to replace Robinson regardless of Parker's emergence. Kidd was never option #1.
Chump, no state income tax in SA offsets that $3 million. Besides that extra money isn't worth hampering the team you are going to.
next.
Weren't you the one who said outright signings of max FAs never happen? That it's always a sign and trade?
Don't discount the goodwill factor--the Spurs will have to deal with others in the future and there's nothing gained by stiffing Duffy and/or Thorn if it's not necessary,
Um, no. I never said that. I usually don't have strong opions about the financial aspects of free agent signings.
From a logical standpoint, with both Kidd and Claxton being unrestricted free agents, what is the benefit or purpose of doing a sign-and-trade?
Question.
More money for both players.
Goodwill toward men.
If you don't want to accept the answer be my guest.
Then tell me the last max FA signing accomplished without a sign and trade under the current CBA.
Question.
:p
I apologize for not having the time to babysit you, GhostWhiner. Ditto for the Rear Admiral.
Feel free to continue to misrepresent my point in order to make yourself feel better. If arguments on a messageboard actually meant something I might waste more time than what it will take to close this sentence.
Whatever, Marcus. You're the #1 J. O'Neal fan. Right.
Chump, you keep missing one fundamental thing here:
Both Kidd and Claxton are unrestrivted free agents, therefore, they can simply sign with another team and make relatively the same amount of money.
To answer your Question., I can't think of one, because those all involved signing-and-trading a star for players under contract.
Good one.
In one thread you are all over JO'Neal and in the other you claim never to have wanted this 'Holting Pattern'. F'in ' .
And you're missing actual history.Chump, you keep missing one fundamental thing here:
Both Kidd and Claxton are unrestrivted free agents, therefore, they can simply sign with another team and make relatively the same amount of money.
Grant Hill for Atkins and Wallace.
TMac for a second round pick.
Reality is against you on this one, Ghost.
Follow the course of the conversation, Marcus.
Did I want to add some championship pieces during the Holt-ing Pattern?
Absolutely. So did you, jackass.
Now that we've endured the Holt-ing Pattern, do I have a top choice to pursue?
Yes. Jermaine O'Neal.
Do I think we'll land O'Neal?
No. That's why I set my sights on Olowokandi as a reasonable acquisition about a year ago.
I thought you were in exile again, Kidd-lover?
Question.
Better a Kidd-lover than a Kandi-lover that's for certain.
Keep droning on, Mr. 20/20 Hindsight. No one believes you.
If I am so redundant, then there should be tons of people telling me that I have changed my tune, no?
What don't you believe?
I was not in favor of the Holt-ing Pattern.
Neither were you. You had a hard-on for Sprewell and Mihm among others, pal.
I wanted a big man replacement all along as good as O'Neal/Bran, but I was realistic enough to expect Olowokandi.
We'll see who's more on target this summer. Again.
If we harken back over the years, you've been right exactly once with the signing of Derek Anderson. All those other years? You betcha.
I wanted them to pursue Webber. They did. He didn't want to come. End of story. You worry about cute little names and whining about God knows what. I'll spend my time looking at what's possible, not worrying about such awful things like being able to sign a great player outright just after the Spurs won a championship.
Marcus, there are Kid lovers in prison right now, that is where those pervs belong...Much better to be a candy lover. BTW, you spelled Kid and Candy wrong...better brush up on your spelling skills.
Whatever, Marcus.
I wanted Webber, too.
I was not sold, however, on your emamie schemes of getting such luminaries as Lamond Murray and Chris Mihm on this team.
It's nice to see you're finally on the O'Neal/Brandwagon, Kidd-lover.
Yeah, I participated in a discussion about that deal once. ing learn how to actually participate in a discussion that doesn't entail whining about what never could have happened.
U should learn to debate without insulting people and having a PMS rant just because they dont want Jason Kidd.
Please learn how to post in an intelligible manner using complete sentences, TPark.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions