The premise of this thread is a joke, though, since nobody would ever be put to the choice presented.
You might as well ask if anyone would prefer Zarlakc the Lesser of Seti Alpha 12 over Saddam -- the point seems to be one of suggesting that Liberals who question the war in Iraq are inherently anti-American, which is a fallacious conclusion.
Asking if someone would choose the lesser of two perceived evils doesn't do anything to prove that their position is inferior or that they are unpatriotic. Any sensible person would pick George Bush over Saddam Hussein. I know I would. But it doesn't follow from that truth that any person who makes that choice thinks Bush is the best possible President for this nation or that Bush is somehow justified in prosecuting a war in Iraq. It just proves that any sensible person would prefer a man who plays by democratic principles over a dictator.

Reply With Quote
it's "spreading democracy" 
