Reply With Quote
@ this thread.
George Bush convinced the Vikings to trade three future picks to the Cowboys for Hershel Walker.
George Bush sodomized my sister while slapping my mother with a wet sock.
Give me time, Stout.
Facts speak for themselves. Taken in itself, my post seems laughable, but not one person even tried to prove that anything I posted is factually wrong. Fact is, if you dig deep enough there are, through-out history, prominent families in the U.S. who seem to have their hands in everything, the Bloombergs, the Rockefellers in the past, and the Bushs and Bin Ladens today. Coincidink? Not if your a serious student of American history.
Whether you realize it or not, the JFK assassination was a turning point for our country, and if you want to know who conspired to kill JFK, and later his brother Robert, all you have to do is ask yourself who benefited the most with the Kennedy family out of the way?
Dude, Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy! I used to be big into the conspiricy theories. But once I did research on my own, not just listening to all the conspiricy people, I realized, much to my disappointment, that it was Oswald.
There is so much disinformation out there about the JFK assassination, it's very difficult to distinquish between what is real and what is not these days. Forget all the stories and eye-witness testimonials, look at just the physical evidence. The Magic bullet, the bent scope on Oswald's 'alleged' rifle, the poorly photo-shopped picture of Oswald holding said rifle, the poor security by the secret service that day, the re-rerouting of JFK's route to include the Library area, the ignored warnings, the 'alleged' shooting of officer Tippet by Oswald, the coincidences go on and on...
BEWARE OF THE FEZ....
JFK: How the Media Assassinated the Real Story
By Robert Hennelly & Jerry Policoff
Real History ArchivesIf the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy was one of the darkest tragedies in the republic's history, the reporting of it has remained one of the worst travesties of the American media. From the first reports out of Dallas in November of 1963, to the merciless flagellation of Oliver Stone's JFK over the last several months, the mainstream media have disgraced themselves by hewing blindly to the single-assassin theory advanced by the FBI within hours of the murder.
"Efforts over the last 29 years have met the same fate as Oliver Stone's movie: derision from the mainstream media. At first, the public bought the party line. But gradually, as more and more information slipped through the margins of the media business, and finally through the efforts of Congress itself, the public began to change its mind."
In its very first issue after the assassination, Life magazine seriously misrepresented the content of the Zapruder film, a practice that would continue until the film finally gained general release in 1975. The doctors at Parkland Hospital, who had worked on the president, had reported that he had suffered an "apparent" entrance wound to the throat. Since the book depository, from which Oswald had allegedly fired, was to the presidential limousine's rear, how, some were beginning to wonder, did the president suffer a frontal throat wound? Life's December 6, 1963, edition gave a simple and conclusive explanation, based on the Zapruder film, an answer only Life could provide.
Wrote Life: "The 8mm film shows the President turning his body far around to the right as he waves to someone in the crowd. His throat is exposed to the sniper's nest just before he clutches it." This description of the Zapruder film went a long way toward allaying fears of conspiracy in those early days, for it explained away a troublesome inconsistency in the lone assassin scenario. There was only one problem: The description of the Zapruder film was a total fabrication. Although the film shows Kennedy turning to the right--toward the grassy knoll, that is--at no time does he turn 180 degrees toward the book depository. Indeed, by the time he is hit, he is once again turning toward the front.
"Meanwhile, Life's sister publication, Time, did its best to swat away any and all conspiracy talk. Time countered the ground swell of conspiracy rumors in Europe with an article in its June 12, 1964, issue. En led "J.F.K.: The Murder and the Myths," the article blamed the speculation on "leftist" writers and publications seeking a "rightist conspiracy." Proponents of further investigation suffered fates similar to that of Thomas Buchanan, who in 1964 wrote the first book critical of the Warren Report, Who Killed Kennedy. Buchanan's thesis was groundless, Time argued, because he had allegedly been "fired by the Washington Star in 1948 after he admitted membership in the Communist party."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
