Same people that push the similarities between Lincoln and jfk
It's a very advanced operation that leaves arbitrary little cookie crumbs like this just because.
Same people that push the similarities between Lincoln and jfk
Dublin ain't swallowing the .
This corrupt phuck OTOH:
Trump releases statement about the Queen's death: 'What a grand and beautiful lady she was—there was nobody like her!' (msn.com)
considering that news report talks about her health they were probably talking about something else
Most re ed thing I've read today. Thanks
lol very on brand of you.
”Make our joke before we can????? How dare you!”
Triggered by the mirror
https://www.amazon.com/History-Thiev.../dp/1846275857The History Thieves by Ian Cobain review – how Britain covered up its imperial crimes
This engrossing study identifies secrecy as a ‘very British disease’, exploring how, as the empire came to an end, government officials burned the records of imperial rule
Operation Legacy
https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-papers-empireDetailed instructions were issued over methods of destruction, in order to erase all evidence of the purge. When do ents were burned, "the waste should be reduced to ash and the ashes broken up", while any that were being dumped at sea must be "packed in weighted crates and dumped in very deep and current-free water at maximum practicable distance from the coast".
Death estimates are between 2 and 4 million people
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/...l-famine-studyThe Bengal famine of 1943 estimated to have killed up to three million people was not caused by drought but instead was a result of a “complete policy failure” of the then-British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, a recent study has said.
The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, provided scientific backing for arguments that Churchill’s policies played a significant role in contributing to the 1943 catastrophe.
The researchers analysed a soil moisture database cover the years 1870 to 2016 to reconstruct agricultural droughts.
The researchers studied six major famines in the subcontinent between 1873 and 1943 and concluded that the Bengal famine was the only famine that does not appear to be linked directly to soil moisture deficit and crop failures.
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2...ion-from-indiaThere is a story that is commonly told in Britain that the colonisation of India – as horrible as it may have been – was not of any major economic benefit to Britain itself. If anything, the administration of India was a cost to Britain. So the fact that the empire was sustained for so long – the story goes – was a gesture of Britain’s benevolence.
New research by the renowned economist Utsa Patnaik – just published by Columbia University Press – deals a crushing blow to this narrative. Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)