KC
This board should know better.
Kevin O'Connor is a buffoon. This is the same guy that swore Killian Hayes (and some other mega bust that I can't remember) was gonna be a star.
I'd take Hollinger, Ben Taylor or Zach Lowe's opinions on the Spurs before that idiot.
KC
This board should know better.
he just read the Pauleta thread on spurstalk and thought it would be a smart take
They, like we do, base their pov on recency bias most of the time.
It's been only 6 games and most players have looked from really bad, to decent, to excellent.
Let's wait a few more games to start any trend
He’s literally had one meh game this year. That’s 5-1, about the highest consistency you can get from a 21 year old.
I think KOC only looked on the offensive side and discounted Jeremy's defense or what seems to be a team goal of prioritizing defense. And, that VW actually likes hanging outside the 3P line by choice.
This. A Wemby who learns to be elite on the perimeter would be more valuable than one who stays inside. I just wish he’d dribble less. Run around and get to your spots. You’re more Dirk than T-Mac tbh.
Except he’s 25 now.
I don't even know who people are talking about at this point... but nothing aged Poorly about KOC's take, except the part about Sochan which was off base from the start. Despite a good game from Keldon and Collins, everything said about them is still true. Both of these bums will hold our team back, which might be by design... who knows
The discussion is about Sochan. Please try to pick upon context and not be so wrong all the time.
I was referring to Keldon when the thread was about Sochan. Don’t talk to me about not being wrong when your dumbass is always wrong.
Jeff Errors uh huh
Do you see that X on your browser tab? Click on it, and go away. The adults, and generally people that can read for context are talking.
Shut up got. How about that?
Not even sure why you’re flexing today.![]()
Keldon was mentioned in the article. I was referring to him in John B’s post. That’s why I mentioned Keldon. So go off with your nonsense, boy.
You quoted me, smoothie.
After you quoted me. Do you have dementia? You’re way too re ed to be so smug.
I would only quote you point out a up, which you admitted to. You’re just not interesting or knowledgeable enough to discuss basketball with.
John b says take does not age well.
I said Keldon needs to do more before we clamor for him.
You responded to me thinking I was talking about sochan. That was the disconnect.
You proceeded to be more of a re . I didn’t realize i triggered such a reaction but okay feel what you feel. A lot of people on here think you’re a dumbass too.
Ex is on her period today. Attacking me because he’s too dumb to understand I wasn’t referring to Sochan.
I agree the take didn't age poorly, but that's only because it was bad when it was made. I've already talked about it being wrong in premise because it was making assumptions that were not sound. Their whole argument comes from the assumption that Wemby is the guy he was against the Jazz but artificially looks like the guy he was against Houston and OKC because the team around him makes him look bad. That's obviously wrong, and that opinion can only come from not actually watching the games. The team reaching the play-in is not based on what two of their bench players do. Like we can talk about Johnson and Collins all we want. There's obviously a ton of criticism for them on this site. But the Spurs struggled early because of how disorganized they'd become on offense, and that has nothing to do with their backup wing or backup center.
The only premise that had merit at all is the Pop needing to be more creative on offense. That was true, and last game was progress in that area. But attacking Sochan, Johnson and Collins to excuse Wemby not being ready to score against good defenders playing an updated game plan. Wemby is not the Jazz guy, or rather he's both the Jazz guy and the Rockets/Thunder guy. KOC and his friend watch so little of the Spurs that they didn't understand that and listed off a number of silly ideas to explain a question that already had an answer. The Spurs' supporting cast can get better, but it's plenty good for Victor to take the steps he needed as it is. There's more evidence now that a Markkanen deal would've been a big mistake.
You weren’t talking about Keldon, smoothie, you were comparing someone to him. Who was that? Sochan, maybe?
It’s on par with Keldon to be inconsistent. He has bad games that follow good games. That’s what I meant. I thought I wasn’t worth your time so why you still engaging? You clearly have dementia and are just finding ways to take my post out of context.
Also smoothie? What a ing twink. Is that what you say to Mrs Body when she’s ramming you?
Well, it was another up, so I quoted you, and proved you WERE talking about Sochan, even though you tried to weasel and lie your way out of it. ‘Smoothie’ refers to your brain surface topography. You might have to look up that last word. It’s OK if you do.
I’m also a sochan fan and have been praising him so far. Ex’s dumbass didn’t realize that lol.
Yeah you’re just making up now, go take your meds you senile
Not worth your time to engage but still doing it and shooting yourself in the foot more lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)