Funny how right wing dudes are quick to accuse France, Germany, Russia, etc of having economic interests in Iraq but when people hint the US-led invasion was driven, among other things, by oil revenues (something I do not agree with), those same guys dismiss you as anti-american.
yes protecting america's energy supplies.. shouldn't matter in times of war.. after all who needs oil.. but a economy drunk on oil..!!Funny how right wing dudes are quick to accuse France, Germany, Russia, etc of having economic interests in Iraq but when people hint the US-led invasion was driven, among other things, by oil revenues (something I do not agree with), those same guys dismiss you as anti-american.
Huh?
So you agree with the statement that America went to war in Iraq because of the oil?
Then we should be at war with the State of Texas, because rich Texas oil barons were some of the biggest profiteers of Saddam food-for-oil coupons. When you examine the facts your attacks on countries and organizations that did not fall for administration's Iraq WMD scam fall flat.
I don't think all the dissenters should shut the up. Just Ohgee.
accuse? isn't it a known fact saddam was paying those clowns ?
What are you talking about ? Oil ? see how those gas prices dropped ! - amazing - no doubt we are dependent on oil - I doubt that oil was one of the major concerns or aims of the war though. What otehr revenues are you referring to ? ?Haliburton ? - you m ean that same company that has attempted to sell the same contracts they own but that nobody wants to buy because they aren't making any money ??
Hey, maybe those contracts should've been bid upon, eh?Haliburton ? - you m ean that same company that has attempted to sell the same contracts they own but that nobody wants to buy because they aren't making any money ??
eh ?
well they have proven to be so profitable for haliburton man - obvious conspiracy there.
Wake me when they file chapter seven.
You mean Chapter 11 don't you ? Typically businesses will file an 11 - you will see the ocassional 7 but it is rare. I mean even Enron filed an 11.
No I meant 7. If these contracts are that bad it'll be 7.
Accusations against the US govt's sole reason to invade iraq are just that,...accusations.
France, P-russia, etc, are not, they have been proven to be collaboraters in the Oil for Food investigation,...
NEXT!
Haliburton didnt put all its eggs in Iraq, so they wouldnt have to file bankruptcy if they failed so.
But nothing short of Haliburton tanking would convince you of the conservative viewpoint on the iraq profiteering.
Nevertheless, remain being a pessimistic psuedo non partisan bs of a closet democrat who doesn't care to see the country have a good succesful war.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote