Reply With Quote
Don't give them that much credit. I believe they only combined for three rebounds
I was talking about the inbounds pass.
Don't give them that much credit. I believe they only combined for three rebounds
Tony Parker or Gino was the correct option and they managed to it up again.
Yeah, they stumbled to the ground when Ray Allen was called for a charge. Allen was on Bowens legs and bowen gave him a shove in the back with his foot trying to get him off. It was just a stupid move and it gave them a spark.
Didn't the Allen 3 come after an offensive rebound?
wow alot of people sound like mav's fan after every lost,start pointing fingers at players and coaches,it's a lost and get over it.
C'mon, it's obvious the Spurs didn't take the Sonics seriously and only put in the effort late. They left themselves at the mercy of the refs at that point, and presto.
The Spurs were rolling, up double figures. Allen tried to jump into Bowen to draw a foul, but Bruce played it perfectly and they called Allen for an offensive foul.I missed that part...what happened that made Bowen kick Allen? He literally kicked Allen in the back??
When they fell on the ground Allen was on top of one of Bowen's legs, and Bowen kicked him in the back.
Allen got pissed, and the rest is history. Let's put it this way - Allen was like 1-5 at that point and I think he finished 16-20. The Spurs had all the momentum at that point, but when Bowen did that he set Ray Allen off, and the rest of the Sonics followed.
The Spurs got this anyway.... but this Ginobili on the bench will be brought up later.
Seattle > San Antonio
(just teasing SequSpur)
Yep. Like I said, Seattle knew Tim was going to get the ball at the end, and wouldn't you know the help defender made the steal.Tony Parker or Gino was the correct option and they managed to it up again.
The ball should have been in Manu's hands at the end, if not his then Tony's. Going to Tim was lame, predictable, Pop's sole brainstorm at the end of games when we need a bucket, and gets us beat 8 times out of 10.
Gregg Popovich special. Six seconds left on the clock and you get a turnover because you're trying to force it into Duncan. in' A...
No, it came off of a Pick and roll.
How are you including Rasho in this?? He played less than 7 minutes, grabbed 2 rebounds, blocked a Ray Allen shot from behind, and the team played well with him in there. He should have been in there in the second half instead of Nazr who had 1 rebound and 3 turnovers in 20 minutes tonight.
I am sick of bad defense-- Seattle shot 52% tonight. I do not care what anyone says-- the defense was so much better when Rasho started. The defensive tone was set from the beginning.
see my tim should not be the #1 option thread.
i thought horry should have inbounded, and manu could have come to the ball. i seem to remember that being successful before, i was surprised manu inbounded.
Oh wtf ever. This thread is an AHF special if anything. Duncan dominated all game inside while Manu couldnt' stay on the court in the fourth. The help defender made the steal because tehre was no call while Duncan was held. The play call was fine.
That sucks...seems a little out of character for Bruce.
Umm.. I get your point but Ray Allen was 5-for-10 at the time of the incident.The Spurs were rolling, up double figures. Allen tried to jump into Bowen to draw a foul, but Bruce played it perfectly and they called Allen for an offensive foul.
When they fell on the ground Allen was on top of one of Bowen's legs, and Bowen kicked him in the back.
Allen got pissed, and the rest is history. Let's put it this way - Allen was like 1-5 at that point and I think he finished 16-20. The Spurs had all the momentum at that point, but when Bowen did that he set Ray Allen off, and the rest of the Sonics followed.
Our best big pick and roll defender sits on the bench. Wait until we play Sacramento in the play-offs.
Don't give them that much credit. I believe they only combined for three reboundsDamn, how the does that happen?
Nazr sucked. Rasho played fine.
Actually our defense was great until Bowen kicked the hornet's nest in the back.I do not care what anyone says-- the defense was so much better when Rasho started. The defensive tone was set from the beginning.
While Duncan "dominated" we ended up down 9 points with 3 minutes left to play. In the last two minutes of the game Manu brought us back to give us a two point lead (that's +11).Oh wtf ever. This thread is an AHF special if anything. Duncan dominated all game inside while Manu couldnt' stay on the court in the fourth.
Who the cares about foul trouble during the game? The point is you want the ball in the hands of the guy who can create at the end of the game, not someone who had just shortarmed a shot over Johan freakin' Petro two minutes earlier.
BTW, Amuseddaysleeper - you're preaching to the choir on the go to option thing. Glad to see you're getting some run with it - whenever I bring it up people ask for my NBA coaching credentials
Are you going to address the fact you exagerated the out of your point with your 1-for-5 statement?
exactly, with the game on the line you ing should just go for it. i dont care if manu has 5 fouls with 2 minutes left, you take the risk because you're LOSING. i dont know what was worse, the defense, or the coaching
BTW, Amuseddaysleeper - you're preaching to the choir on the go to option thing. Glad to see you're getting some run with it - whenever I bring it up people ask for my NBA coaching credentials
way too many homers on the board man, but unlike me, at least your posts have logic!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
