Quote: "That's what the difference is. The NBA is the end-all for basketball players. You play basketball, you want to make it into the NBA. You play soccer, you want to play in the World Cup. It's two different things.
Basketball is now a global sport. The US has done it's job. Sending a compe ive team to play in the Olympics won't do anything to help them improve. They have the coaches, players and know how to grow on their own accord."
Well TimVP, FIFA made the decision on the Olympics, not an individual country. And that rule applies to ALL countries that wish to participate in the Olympics. For myself, I wouldn't have a problem if FIBA set an age limit for basketball, so to place more importance on the World Basketball Championships. (which is the equivalent to the World Cup for soccer)
I understand that in the USA, the NBA is the end-all for up and coming players. And I hope that as basketball continues to become more of a global sport, that will change. Because for soccer, players also dream to play for their favorite club teams, but they also dream to play for the national team as well.
I guess overall, my dissatisfaction is with Team USA and how they approach international basketball in general. Not just the Olympics. For me, the World Basketball Championships are more important, and that is the at ude that all of the other countries take as well. Why do you think players like Vlade Divac and Peja chose not to play (well, besides Vlade being an old fart)? They come out in DROVES for the World Basketball Championships. I remember a quote from Antonio Davis back in 2002, when he was shocked at how seriously the foreign teams took the tournament. It was MUCH more important to them than the Olympics.

Reply With Quote